Abstract:Scientific collaboration has been a hot topic and investigated a lot over the decades. In this paper, we collect and set up a comprehensive scientific dataset that comprises more than 150 million papers with multiple attribute information from over 170 countries and regions across different disciplines and fields. Although there have been various studies on scientific collaboration based on authors' age, this paper is dedicated to unfolding the data in a time dimension and discovering a new perspective on the evolution of collaboration between authors and countries. An intensive study is provided to give a depth and close analysis of the collaboration between authors and international scientific collaboration from the perspective of authors' academic age. The two-author collaborative mode based on the academic age is defined to investigate the collaborative pattern. We find that as time goes by, although the Beginning scholars continue to rise sharply, the proportion of collaboration between Beginning scholars decreases gradually, and the diversity of the collaborative pattern becomes more apparent. We further extend the two-author mode into international scientific collaboration by considering the national attributes of authors' affiliation. Internal collaboration does not account for a large proportion of the overall scientific collaboration. Different countries exhibit different collaborative patterns expanded over time, but the proportion of collaboration between Beginning scholars plays a key factor to make a distinction between collaborative patterns of countries. Moreover, based on the similarities and discrepancies of the collaborative mode of countries and regions, we classify them into two clusters. The clustering results provide a good distinction between countries and regions in terms of the volume of national publications. The collaborations between Beginning scholars occupy more than half of the overall scientific collaboration for the countries with less number of papers. In contrast, the countries with a larger number of papers have a more diversified and relatively balanced collaborative mode.

Developed Countries Dominate Leading Roles in International Scientific Collaborations: Evidence from Scholars' Self‐Reported Contribution in Publications

Persistent Hierarchy in Contemporary International Collaboration

An In-Depth Analysis of Government Funding and International Collaboration in Scientific Research

China's Rising Leadership in Global Science

A Bibliometric Perspective on the Roles of Government Funding and International Collaboration in Scientific Research.

The dominance of big teams in China’s scientific output

The dominance of big teams in China's scientific output

Contributorship in scientific collaborations: The perspective of contribution-based byline orders

A Comparative Study of Domestic and Cross‐country Impact of Chinese and U.S. Publications in Chemistry

Openness and Impact of Leading Scientific Countries

Regional Analysis on Chinese Scientific Output

A global perspective on social stratification in science

Untangling the Network Effects of Productivity and Prominence among Scientists

High-income countries remain overrepresented in highly ranked public health journals: a descriptive analysis of research settings and authorship affiliations

A half-century of global collaboration in science and the 'Shrinking World'

In-depth analysis on China’s international cooperation in science

Collaborative Characteristics and Networks of National, Institutional and Individual Contributors Using Highly Cited Articles in Environmental Engineering in Science Citation Index Expanded

Cooperation and interdependence in global science funding

Collaboration Diversity and Scientific Impact

Evolution of scientific collaboration based on academic ages

Impact of Scientific, Economic, Geopolitical, and Cultural Factors on International Research Collaboration