Abstract:Background: The morphology of sagittal alignment varies in normal population. Sagittal alignment was classified into four subgroups; however, this classification was performed based on senior authors' clinical experiences rather than scientific methods. The objective of this study is to classify the morphology of sagittal alignment in normal population and describe the characteristics of sagittal alignment in each subgroup. Methods: Medical records of asymptomatic volunteers without known spinal diseases in our outpatient clinic from January 2015 to August 2015 were reviewed. Demographic data and radiological parameters were evaluated, and compared between males and females as well. Two-step cluster analysis was performed. Radiological parameters were compared among these subgroups and then, the characteristics of each group were described. Receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) curve was constructed to detect the optimal cut-off value of separation of individual spine. Results: 230 healthy volunteers with mean age of 33.53 years old were recruited (male: female = 106: 124). No significant difference of each demographic and radiological parameter was observed between males and females, except for maxLL and PT. Two types of sagittal alignment were classified by the two-step cluster analysis. Type I (57.8%): small sagittal curves with small maxTK (29.24 degrees +/- 4.99 degrees), maxLL (43.99 degrees +/- 9.10 degrees) and PI (43.49 degrees +/- 7.61 degrees), and Type II (42.2%): large sagittal curves with large maxTK (43.10 degrees +/- 6.41 degrees), maxLL (53.41 degrees +/- 9.59 degrees) and PI (53.10 degrees +/- 11.82 degrees). The mean value of age, SS, PT, SVA, TPA, T1 sagittal angle, maxLL-maxTK, SS-PT and PI-maxLL was 37.07 +/- 11.54 years old, 31.64 degrees +/- 7.43 degrees, 15.66 degrees +/- 7.34 degrees, 4.57 +/- 22.24 mm, 10.85 degrees +/- 7.45 degrees, 16.77 degrees +/- 5.09 degrees, 10.31 degrees +/- 9.58 degrees, 15.97 degrees +/- 10.74 degrees and 3.32 degrees +/- 8.91 degrees in Type I, and 39.94 +/- 12.73 years old, 37.88 degrees +/- 8.36 degrees, 15.29 degrees +/- 7.89 degrees, 4.19+/-22.00 mm, 9.23 degrees +/- 7.28 degrees, 23.37 degrees +/- 4.87 degrees, 16.74 degrees +/- 9.42 degrees, 22.59 degrees +/- 11.64 degrees and -5.84 degrees +/- 10.70 degrees in Type II, respectively. maxTK, maxLL, PI, SS, T1 sagittal angle, maxLL-maxTK, SS-PT and PI-LL in Type II were greater than those in Type I, while no significant difference was found in age, gender, PT, SVA and TPA between two groups. On the basis of the ROC curve, the optimal cut-off values of maxTK, maxLL and PI as indicators for classification of sagittal alignment were projected to be 37 degrees, 52 degrees and 49 degrees, respectively. Conclusions: There were two subgroups of sagittal plane in normal population. The optimal cut-off values of maxTK, maxLL and PI as indicators for classification of sagittal alignment were projected to be 37 degrees, 52 degrees and 49 degrees, respectively. This novel classification could provide guidelines for our further understandings of sagittal alignment and mechanisms of different spinal diseases more easily, which also help to restore sagittal balance in the correction surgery more accurately. (C) 2017 The Japanese Orthopaedic Association. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Thoracolumbar Sagittal Morphology and Segmental Inclination

Thoracolumbar Sagittal Morphology and Segmental Inclination: A Cross-sectional Cohort Study of Asymptomatic Adult Volunteers.

The factors influencing the adjustment function of PI on spinal sagittal balance in normal subject

Age-based normal sagittal alignment in Chinese asymptomatic adults: establishment of the relationships between pelvic incidence and other parameters

Sagittal alignment of spine and pelvis in asymptomatic adults: norms in Chinese populations.

The Pelvic Incidence Stratified Sagittal Spinopelvic Alignment in Asymptomatic Chinese Population with Different Age Groups

Sagittal Plane Analysis of the Spine and Pelvis in Adult Idiopathic Scoliosis.

Age- and gender-related normative value of whole-body sagittal alignment based on 584 asymptomatic Chinese adult population from age 20 to 89.

Sagittal Plane Analysis of the Spine and Pelvis in Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis

Cervical Sagittal Alignment and Balance Associated with Aging Chinese Adults: A Radiographic Analysis

An Analysis of the Interactions Between the Spine, Pelvis, and Lower Limbs in Asymptomatic Adults with Limited Pelvic Compensation.

Pelvic index: A new pelvic parameter for assessing sagittal spinal alignment

Impact of Pelvic Anteversion on Spinopelvic Alignment in an Asymptomatic Population: a Dynamic Perspective of Standing and Sitting

Is There a Relation Between High Pelvic Incidence and Sagittal Angle of Posterior Lumbar Facets?

Radiographic Patterns and Characteristics of Sagittal Profiles in Normal Spinopelvic Curvatures: an Explicit Depiction of the Distribution of Lumbar Vertebral Bodies and Discs

Compensatory Mechanism of Maintaining the Sagittal Balance in Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis Patients with Different Pelvic Incidence

Analysis of Spino-pelvic Sagittal Alignment in Young Chinese Patients with Lumbar Disc Herniation

T1 Pelvic and Lumbar Pelvic Angles Normative Values: A Prospective Cohort Study of 472 Asymptomatic Volunteers

Analysis of Spinopelvic Sagittal Alignment in Patients with Thoracic and Thoracolumbar Angular Kyphosis

Description of Age-Related Changes in Cervical Sagittal Alignment Based on Pelvic Incidence Classification in Asymptomatic Chinese Population

The Morphology of Sagittal Alignment in Asymptomatic Volunteers of East China: A Novel Radiological Classification.