Abstract:Purpose To perform a systematic review to compare FDG-PET, CT, and MRI imaging for diagnosis of local residual or recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Materials and methods MEDLINE, EMBASE, the CBMdisc databases and some other databases were searched for relevant original articles published from January 1990 to June 2007. Inclusion criteria were as follows: Articles were reported in English or Chinese; FDG-PET, CT, or MRI was used to detect local residual or recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma; histopathologic analysis and/or close clinical and imaging follow-up for at least 6 months were the reference standard. Two reviewers independently extracted data. A software called “Meta-DiSc” was used to obtain pooled estimates of sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves, and the Q∗ index. Results Twenty-one articles fulfilled all inclusion criteria. The pooled sensitivity estimates for PET (95%) were significantly higher than CT (76%) (P < 0.001) and MRI (78%) (P < 0.001). The pooled specificity estimates for PET (90%) were significantly higher than CT (59%) (P < 0.001) and MRI (76%) (P < 0.001). The pooled DOR estimates for PET (96.51) were significantly higher than CT (7.01) (P < 0.001) and MRI (8.68) (P < 0.001). SROC curve for FDG-PET showed better diagnostic accuracy than CT and MRI. The Q∗ index for PET (0.92) was significantly higher than CT (0.72) (P < 0.001) and MRI (0.76) (P < 0.01). For PET, the sensitivity and diagnostic OR for using qualitative analysis were significantly higher than using both qualitative and quantitative analyses (P < 0.01). For CT, the sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic OR, and the Q∗ index for dual-section helical and multi-section helical were all significantly higher than nonhelical and single-section helical (P < 0.01). And the sensitivity for ‘section thickness <5 mm’ was significantly lower than ‘=5 mm’ (P < 0.01), while the specificity was significantly higher (P < 0.01). For MRI, there were no significant differences found between magnetic field strength <1.5 and ⩾1.5 T (P > 0.05). Conclusion FDG-PET was the best modality for diagnosis of local residual or recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma. The type of analysis for PET imaging and the section thickness for CT would affect the diagnostic results. Dual-section helical and multi-section helical CT were better than nonhelical and single-section helical CT.

[18F]FDG PET/CT Versus [18F]FDG PET/MRI in the Diagnosis of Lymph Node Metastasis in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Head-to-head comparison of 18 F-FDG PET/CT and 18 F-FDG PET/MRI for lymph node metastasis staging in non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis

Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Value Of18f-Fdg PET or PET/CT for Detecting Lymph Node and Distant Metastases in Patients with Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

FDG-PET, CT, MRI for Diagnosis of Local Residual or Recurrent Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Which One is the Best? A Systematic Review

Head-to-Head Comparison of [18F]FDG PET Imaging and MRI for the Detection of Recurrence or Residual Tumor in Patients with Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis

[Meta-Analysis of PET/CT for Diagnosis of Residual/recurrent Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma].

Diagnostic accuracy of F-18 FDG PET or PET/CT for detection of lymph node metastasis in clinically node negative head and neck cancer patients; A systematic review and meta-analysis

[Comparison Between PET/CT and MRI in Diagnosing Lymph Node Metastasis and N Staging of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma].

Benefit of [18F]-FDG PET/CT for treatment-naïve nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Optimal Modality for Detecting Distant Metastasis in Primary Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma During Initial Staging: A Systemic Review and Meta-analysis of 1774 Patients.

Comparison of 18FDG PET/PET-CT and Bone Scintigraphy for Detecting Bone Metastases in Patients with Nasopharyngeal Cancer: a Meta-Analysis

Diagnostic Accuracy of [18F]FDG PET/MRI in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis

Diagnostic Accuracy of [18F]FDG 18 F]FDG PET/MRI in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis

A head-to-head comparison of 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT and 2-[18F]FDG PET/MR in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma under different disease settings

A head-to-head comparison of 18F-FDG PET/CT and 18F-FDG PET/MR in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma under different disease settings

Significant value of 18 F-FDG-PET/CT in diagnosing small cervical lymph node metastases in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy

[Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in Diagnosis and Staging of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma].

Comparison of [18F] FDG PET/CT and [18F]FDG PET/MRI in the Detection of Distant Metastases in Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

Diagnostic potential of [18F]FDG PET/MRI in non-small cell lung cancer lymph node metastasis: a meta-analysis

F-18-Fdg Pet, Combined Fdg-Pet/Ct And Mri For Evaluation Of Bone Marrow Infiltration In Staging Of Lymphoma: A Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis

A head-to-head comparison of 68 Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 and 18 F-FDG PET/MR in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a prospective study