Abstract:Purpose The authors test the effect of expenditure decentralization and fiscal equalization on short- and long-run economic growth and estimate two-step generalized method of moment (GMM) simultaneous equations models, using panel data for China and India for the period 1985 to 2005. The authors estimate two simultaneous equations: a growth equation and equalization equation and find that expenditure decentralization has a negative and statistically significant effect at conventional levels on short-run economic growth for both China and India. However, the authors also find that this result is sensitive to the set of included explanatory variables. This leads the authors to conclude that expenditure decentralization has no effect on short-run economic growth for either country. The authors also find that expenditure decentralization has a positive and statistically significant effect on fiscal equalization for both countries but find no evidence that fiscal equalization affects short-run economic growth for either China or India. In contrast, the authors find that expenditure decentralization has a positive effect on long-run economic growth in the case of India, but not in the case of China. Finally, the authors report evidence that fiscal equalization has no effect on long-run economic growth in the case of China; however, the authors find that equalization has a positive and statistically significant at conventional levels effect on long-run economic growth in India. Design/methodology/approach The authors estimate two-step GMM simultaneous equations models, using panel data for China and India for the period 1985 to 2005. To examine the effect of fiscal decentralization (FD) policies on economic growth in China and India, the authors estimate two equations: a growth equation and an equalization equation. For the growth equation, the authors adopt a production-function-based model that is widely used in the empirical literature on growth; however, the authors do make some compromises with this specification due to the unavailability of certain data. For the equalization equation, the authors include variables that economic theory and empirical evidence suggest influence fiscal disparities among subnational governments which in turn influence the demand for horizontal fiscal equalization (HFE). To the extent possible, the authors employ the same econometric specification, variable constructions and sample periods for both China and India. The authors believe this strategy provides a more rigorous test of the FD hypothesis. Findings The authors find that expenditure decentralization has a negative and statistically significant effect at conventional levels on short-run economic growth for both China and India. However, the authors also find that this result is sensitive to the set of included explanatory variables. This leads to conclude that expenditure decentralization has no effect on short-run economic growth for either country. The authors also find that expenditure decentralization has a positive and statistically significant effect on fiscal equalization for both countries but find no evidence that fiscal equalization affects short-run economic growth for either China or India. In contrast, the authors find that expenditure decentralization has a positive effect on long-run economic growth in the case of India, but not in the case of China. Finally, the authors report evidence that fiscal equalization has no effect on long-run economic growth in the case of China; however, the authors find that equalization has a positive and statistically significant at conventional levels effect on long-run economic growth in India. Research limitations/implications Due to the importance of FD policies, especially to many developing countries that are currently pursuing decentralization reforms, future research should examine the effect of FD on economic growth for other countries. Furthermore, although it would be difficult to do so, future research should examine whether FD promotes political stability on ethnically diverse countries. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, no one has examined the effect of FD policies on India's growth experience. What is more is that this is also the first of its kind to have a comprehensive empirical investigation into these two major developing countries with very interesting similarities and differences in FD policies. It is thus of great importance to examine the effect of expenditure decentralization and HFE on economic growth in China and India.

Fiscal Decentralisation and Renewable Energy Development: Inhibition or Promotion?

Fiscal decentralization and the transformation of regional energy structures in China: Spatial spillover effects and the mediating role of technological innovation

Does fiscal decentralization support green economy development? Evidence from China

Does fiscal decentralization reduce environmental degradation through mitigating resource mismatch and digital transformation? Evidence from China's resource-based cities

Chinese-Style Fiscal Decentralization, Ecological Attention of Government, and Regional Energy Intensity

The nonlinear impact of fiscal decentralization on carbon emissions: from the perspective of biased technological progress

Fiscal Decentralization, Environmental Regulation, and Green Technological Innovation: Evidence from China

A study on the impact of fiscal decentralization on carbon emissions with U-shape and regulatory effect

A Study of Spatial Spillovers from Fiscal Decentralization on the Efficiency of Green Economy—And the Moderating Role of Financial Decentralization

How does financial decentralization synergies carbon reduction and pollution control in China?

How does Chinese-style fiscal decentralization affect green technology innovation?

The impact of fiscal transfer payments on energy conservation and emission reduction in China: Does the development stage matter?

Effects of Chinese-style fiscal decentralization on carbon emissions: is there a role for urban construction investment bonds?

Interlinkages of Fiscal Decentralization, Financial Development, and Carbon Emissions: The Underlying Significance of Natural Resources

Financial Development and Energy Environmental Performance: Evidence from China’s Regional Economies

Can fiscal decentralisation regulate the impact of industrial structure on energy efficiency?

Does fiscal decentralization promote economic growth? An empirical approach to the study of China and India

Green economic development under the fiscal decentralization system: Evidence from china

Does the development of renewable energy promote carbon reduction? Evidence from Chinese provinces

Promoting green economy efficiency through fiscal decentralization and environmental regulation

Does digital financing influence renewable energy performance in China?