Abstract:It is reasonably well accepted that some patients benefit from fusion for the treatment of mechanical low back pain. In just about every study that has looked at the outcome of fusion there has been a discrepancy in the radiographic success rate and the clinical success rate. We have interpreted this finding as an indication that our patient selection has been at fault and that we need better tests to identify which patients will benefit from surgery. Seen in this light the use of an external fixation test to identify candidates for fusion is an attractive idea. The authors have done an admirable job of assessing retrospectively the outcome of their patients undergoing external fixation testing. They have followed up on patients who had both positive and negative tests and on those who did and did not undergo definitive surgery. I think that this study is important in this regard. It is the authors conclusions that give make me a bit uncomfortable. The authors state in their conclusion that “the obtained results seem acceptable and the use of this invasive diagnostic measure in this group of patients seems justified.” My interpretation of the data is not so optimistic. Although their numbers are small one can get an idea of the positive and negative predictive values of the “test”. The problem is that the test is of value only if it allows selection leads to clearly better outcomes in those with a positive test who undergo definitive treatment compared with those who do not. Their data show that if the test was positive (pain improved with external fixation) then 72% of patients improved with surgery and 57% improved without; a result that is not statistically significant. In contrast if the test was negative (no improvement in pain) patients did not do well regardless of treatment. The numbers are small and may represent beta error but the results could signify that a positive external fixator test identifies patients who will do well regardless of the treatment selected and the negative test indicates that no treatment will be effective. The external fixator test is an invasive procedure that does have significant risks. The authors report 5 pin tract infections, one CSF leak and one revision surgery for hematoma.(19% complication rate) Other studies have shown up to a 12% neurologic complication rate The decision to proceed with any therapeutic intervention has to be based on a balance of the risks of the procedure versus the benefit. Their results are very similar to those reported by Bednar who reached the opposite conclusion and felt that the use of the test was not justified. The authors conclude that the “main value of the external fixator assessment is the selection of those patients who should not undergo surgery.” The authors were unable to show a clear benefit of definitive surgery in the group with a positive test and so they cannot conclude that their definitive treatment affected the outcome. Thus the only benefit of the test is to identify those who will do well and those who will not regardless of treatment. Does this justify a 19% risk of complications? The authors are attempting to address a clearly difficult and complex problem but I do not feel that their data justify their conclusion.

The Influence of Upward Social Comparison on Status Consumption in Clothing, Eating, Living, and Travelling: the Mediating Effects of Perceived Self‐improvement and Perceived Superiority

Feeling inferior, showing off: The effect of nonmaterial social comparisons on conspicuous consumption

The More Envious the Consumer, the More Impulsive? the Moderating Role of Self-Monitoring and Product Type

Commentary on The External Fixator

Dual path effects of self-worth on status consumption: evidence from Chinese consumers

Effects of “Face” Consciousness on Status Consumption among Chinese Consumers: Perceived Social Value as a Mediator

The Effect of Social Network Use on Chinese College Students’ Conspicuous Consumption: A Moderated Mediation Model

To Be Respected or Liked: the Influence of Social Comparisons on Consumer Preference for Competence- Versus Warmth-Oriented Products

The Spillover Effect of Incidental Social Comparison on Materialistic Pursuits

The Effect of Product Traditional Cultural Load on Brand Status: Evidence from Young Consumers

Is Conspicuous Consumption Influenced by Cyber-Ostracism? A Moderated Mediation Model

The Social Status and Consumer Preferences of Urban Residents in China(2003-2013)

The Effect of Conspicuous Consumption on Consumer Purchase Intention: The Mediating Role of Perceived Value

The effect of drugs on the snail pharangeal retractor muscle.

Effects of Social Value, Self-Discrepancy, and Face Consciousness on Status Consumption: Perceived Consumer Need for Uniqueness as a Mediator

Materialism and envy as mediators between upward social comparison on social network sites and online compulsive buying among college students

Inner-Self Vs. Outer-Self and Socially Responsible Product Consumption

The Effect of Face Consciousness on Consumption of Counterfeit Luxury Goods

How power distance belief, self-construal, and relationship norms impact conspicuous consumption

Cultural identity and consumer ethnocentrism impacts on preference and purchase of domestic versus import brands: An empirical study in China

Feeling Better and Becoming MoreBenevolent: Impact of Social Comparison on ProsocialBehavior