Abstract:With social media and e-democracy development, decision-making environments and problems have become increasingly complex. Traditional group decision-making, including a small number of decision makers, cannot deal with many practical decision-making problems. Large-scale group decision-making has received extensive attention as an efficient measure to address this issue. This paper proposes a two-stage optimization consensus mechanism for large-scale group decision-making by the Gini coefficient, which considers both the consensus among decision makers' opinions and the fairness of consensus adjustment. First, we introduce an improved density peak clustering method to cluster decision makers into subgroups that can avoid different clustering centers being too close. Then, we define the subgroups' weights by the silhouette coefficient, the subgroup judgment distance, and their sizes. Respecting the importance of minority opinions, we design a new method to identify and adjust the weights of the minority opinions, which considers more aspects than previous ones. Further, we use the Gini coefficient to measure the equity of consensus adjustment of the group and subgroup. Moreover, we present a two-stage Gini coefficient-based consensus mechanism to obtain the adjusted consensus individual decision matrices, which can ensure the minimization and fairness of consensus adjustment and allocation under the set constraints. Based on these results, we give a new large-scale group decision-making method. Notably, it is the first method that fully considers the opinions of minor subgroups and the fairness of allocation results. These characteristics are essential in decision-making problems such as resource allocation and urban public construction. Finally, we show the utility and validity of the new method through a case study and make the comparative analysis from numerical and principle aspects.

Towards large-scale deliberative decision-making: small groups and the importance of triads

An overlap graph model for large‐scale group decision making with social trust information considering the multiple roles of experts

Sequential Deliberation for Social Choice

Complexity of Deliberative Coalition Formation

Democratic forecast: Small groups predict the future better than individuals and crowds.

An approach for reaching consensus in large-scale group decision-making focusing on dimension reduction

Many-option collective decision making: discrete collective estimation in large decision spaces

Large-scale three-way group consensus decision considering individual competition behavior in social networks

Adaptive Consensus Reaching Process with Hybrid Strategies for Large-Scale Group Decision Making

A Hierarchical Consensus Reaching Process for Group Decision Making with Noncooperative Behaviors

Unravelling Expressive Delegations: Complexity and Normative Analysis

A Stackelberg Game Model for Large-Scale Group Decision Making Based on Cooperative Incentives

Network-based evidential three-way theoretic model for large-scale group decision analysis

Delegation Mechanism-Based Large-Scale Group Decision Making with Heterogeneous Experts and Overlapping Communities

A Fair Consensus Adjustment Mechanism for Large-Scale Group Decision Making in Term of Gini Coefficient

How to process local and global consensus? A large-scale group decision making model based on social network analysis with probabilistic linguistic information

An Adaptive Two-Stage Consensus Reaching Process Based on Heterogeneous Judgments and Social Relations for Large-Scale Group Decision Making

An Ordinal-Cardinal Consensus Model for Three-Way Large-Scale Group Decision-Making Considering Co-Opetition Relations

A Social Ties-Based Approach for Group Decision-Making Problems with Incomplete Additive Preference Relations

RoundTable: Investigating Group Decision-Making Mechanism in Multi-Agent Collaboration

Facilitating large-scale group decision-making in social networks: A bi-level consensus model with social influence