Electrostatic Control of Electronic Structure in Modular Inorganic Crystals

Kanta Ogawa,Aron Walsh
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26434/chemrxiv-2024-hqfmj
2024-09-02
Abstract:The rules that govern structure and bonding, established for elemental solids and simple compounds, are challenging to apply to more complex crystals formed of polyatomic building blocks such as layered or framework materials. Whether these modular building blocks are electrically neutral or charged influences the physical properties of the resulting crystal. Despite the prevalence of alternating charged units, their effects on the electronic structure remains unclear. We demonstrate how the distribution of charged building blocks, driven by differences in electrostatic potential, governs the electronic band energies formed in layered crystals. This coarse-grained model predicts the spatially separated valence and conduction band edges observed in the metal-oxyhalide Ba2Bi3Nb2O11Cl and explains observed property trends in the Sillén–Aurivillius crystal system. Moreover, the general nature of the model allows for extension to other modular structure types, illustrated for Sillén and Ruddesden-Popper compounds, and can support the rational design of electronic properties in diverse materials.
Chemistry
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem this paper attempts to address is: how to control the electronic structure in modular inorganic crystals through charge distribution. Specifically, the authors focus on layered crystals composed of charged building blocks, where the impact of charge distribution between these blocks on the electronic band structure is not yet fully understood. By studying the effect of this charge distribution on the electronic structure, the authors hope to explain and predict the physical properties of such materials, particularly the spatial separation of band edges, which is crucial for applications like photocatalysis and solar energy conversion. ### Main Issues: 1. **Impact of Charge Distribution on Electronic Structure**: How can charge distribution be used to describe and control the electronic structure of complex modular materials, such as layered metal oxyhalides? 2. **Spatial Separation of Band Edges**: Why do the valence band maximum (VBM) and conduction band minimum (CBM) appear on different layers in some layered materials? How does this spatial separation affect the photoelectric properties of the materials? 3. **Design and Optimization of Material Properties**: How can the band structure of materials be tuned by adjusting the interlayer distance and charge values to achieve specific electronic properties? ### Research Background: - **Modular Materials**: Many complex inorganic crystals can be viewed as modular structures composed of multi-atomic building blocks. These building blocks can be either electrically neutral or charged. - **Electrically Neutral Materials**: For electrically neutral layered materials, their electronic structure can be approximately predicted by the band structure of a single building block. - **Charged Materials**: For charged layered materials, internal electric fields significantly affect the electronic structure, but the specific mechanisms of this influence are not yet clear. ### Research Methods: - **Density Functional Theory (DFT)**: DFT is used to calculate the electronic structure of materials, including band structure and density of states (DOS). - **Coarse-Grained Potential Model**: A coarse-grained potential model is proposed, treating each layer as a charged parallel plate capacitor, with interlayer interactions described by potential differences. ### Main Findings: - **Spatial Separation of Band Edges**: In materials like Ba2Bi3Nb2O11Cl, the valence band maximum is located in the negatively charged perovskite layer, while the conduction band minimum is in the positively charged fluorite layer. This spatial separation facilitates efficient charge separation and high photocatalytic activity. - **Impact of Potential Difference on Band Structure**: By changing the interlayer distance, the potential difference can be tuned, thereby affecting the band structure. Increasing the interlayer distance reduces the band gap because the energies of the valence band maximum and conduction band minimum become closer. - **Universality of the Model**: The model is not only applicable to Sillén–Aurivillius materials but can also be extended to other types of layered materials, such as Sillén-type and Ruddesden-Popper compounds. ### Conclusion: - **Control Role of Charge Distribution**: Internal electric fields and potential differences are crucial factors in tuning the electronic structure of modular materials. - **Tool for Designing New Materials**: By adjusting interlayer distances and charge values, new materials with specific electronic properties can be designed. - **Universality and Application Prospects**: The model provides a new perspective for understanding and designing the electronic structure of complex materials, aiding in the development of efficient photocatalysts and solar energy conversion materials.