Abstract:Type Ia supernovae play a key role in the evolution of galaxies by polluting the interstellar medium with a fraction of iron peak elements larger than that released in the core-collapse supernova events. Their light curve, moreover, is widely used in cosmological studies as it constitutes a reliable distance indicator on extragalactic scales. Among the mechanisms proposed to explain the Type Ia supernovae (SNe), the single- and double-degenerate channels are thought to be the dominant ones, which implies a different distribution of time delays between the progenitor formation and the explosion. In this paper, we aim to determine the dominant mechanism by comparing a compilation of Type Ia SN rates with those computed from various cosmic star-formation histories coupled with different delay-time distribution functions. We also evaluate the relative contributions of both channels. By using a least-squares fitting procedure, we modeled the observations of Type Ia SN rates assuming different combinations of three recent cosmic star-formation rates and seven delay-time distributions. The goodness of these fits are statistically quantified by the $ test. For two of the three cosmic star-formation rates, the single degenerate scenario provides the most accurate explanation for the observations, while a combination of 34 single-degenerate- and 66 double-degenerate delay-time distributions is more plausible for the remaining tested cosmic star-formation rates. Though dependent on the assumed cosmic star-formation rate, we find arguments in favor of the single-degenerate model. From the theoretic point of view, at least sim 34 of the Type Ia SN must have been produced through the single-degenerate channel to account for the observations. The wide, double-degenerate mechanism slightly under-predicts the observations at redshift $z 1$, unless the cosmic SFR flattens in that regime. On the contrary, although the purely close double-degenerate scenario can be ruled out, we cannot rule out a mixed scenario with single- and double-degenerate progenitors.

ON THE CORRELATION BETWEEN SUPERNOVAE AND TYPES OF GALAXIES

The Spatial Distribution of Type Ia Supernovae within Host Galaxies

Spatially Resolved Properties of Supernova Host Galaxies in SDSS-IV MaNGA

The statistical investigation of type Ib/c and II supernovae and their host galaxies

Linking Transients to their Host Galaxies: II. A Comparison of Host Galaxy Properties and Rate Dependencies across Supernova Types

Linking transients to their host galaxies – II. A comparison of host galaxy properties and rate dependencies across supernova types

Nearby Supernova Rates from the Lick Observatory Supernova Search - III. the Rate-Size Relation, and the Rates As a Function of Galaxy Hubble Type and Colour

[O ii ] as an effective indicator of the dependence between the standardized luminosities of Type Ia supernovae and the properties of their host galaxies

Cosmic Type Ia supernova rate and constraints on supernova Ia progenitors

Correlation of the rate of Type Ia supernovae with the parent galaxy properties: Light and shadows

Core-collapse supernova progenitor constraints using the spatial distributions of massive stars in local galaxies

Determination of the Hubble Constant, the Intrinsic Scatter of Luminosities of Type Ia Supernovae, and Evidence for Nonstandard Dust in Other Galaxies

Revisiting progenitor-age dependence of type Ia supernova luminosity standardization process

Type Ia Supernova Progenitor Properties and Their Host Galaxies

The Counting of Galaxies from Type Ia Supernovae Rate

Toward an inner connection of SNe Ic, SLSNe Ic, XRF connected SNe, SNe Ic-BL, and GRB connected SNe

The diversity of Type Ia Supernovae: evidence for systematics?

The Evolution of the Type Ia Supernova Luminosity Function

Distribution of 56 Ni Yields of Type Ia Supernovae and Its Implication for Progenitors

Evidence for Two Distinct Populations of Type Ia Supernovae