Abstract:Type Ia supernovae play a key role in the evolution of galaxies by polluting the interstellar medium with a fraction of iron peak elements larger than that released in the core-collapse supernova events. Their light curve, moreover, is widely used in cosmological studies as it constitutes a reliable distance indicator on extragalactic scales. Among the mechanisms proposed to explain the Type Ia supernovae (SNe), the single- and double-degenerate channels are thought to be the dominant ones, which implies a different distribution of time delays between the progenitor formation and the explosion. In this paper, we aim to determine the dominant mechanism by comparing a compilation of Type Ia SN rates with those computed from various cosmic star-formation histories coupled with different delay-time distribution functions. We also evaluate the relative contributions of both channels. By using a least-squares fitting procedure, we modeled the observations of Type Ia SN rates assuming different combinations of three recent cosmic star-formation rates and seven delay-time distributions. The goodness of these fits are statistically quantified by the $ test. For two of the three cosmic star-formation rates, the single degenerate scenario provides the most accurate explanation for the observations, while a combination of 34 single-degenerate- and 66 double-degenerate delay-time distributions is more plausible for the remaining tested cosmic star-formation rates. Though dependent on the assumed cosmic star-formation rate, we find arguments in favor of the single-degenerate model. From the theoretic point of view, at least sim 34 of the Type Ia SN must have been produced through the single-degenerate channel to account for the observations. The wide, double-degenerate mechanism slightly under-predicts the observations at redshift $z 1$, unless the cosmic SFR flattens in that regime. On the contrary, although the purely close double-degenerate scenario can be ruled out, we cannot rule out a mixed scenario with single- and double-degenerate progenitors.

Distribution of 56 Ni Yields of Type Ia Supernovae and Its Implication for Progenitors

Type Ic Supernova of a 22 $\text{M}_{\odot}$ Progenitor

The Progenitors of Type Ia Supernovae with Long Delay Times

Evaluating Systematic Dependencies of Type Ia Supernovae: The Influence of Central Density

Modeling the Progenitor Stars of Observed IIP Supernovae

ON THE PROGENITORS OF SUPER-CHANDRASEKHAR MASS TYPE Ia SUPERNOVAE

Type Ia Supernova Progenitor Properties and Their Host Galaxies

On variations of the brightness of type Ia supernovae with the age of the host stellar population

The Intrinsic Stochasticity of the $^{56}$Ni Distribution of Single-Degenerate Type Ia Supernovae

Supernovae Ib and Ic from the explosion of helium stars

Ejecta masses in Type Ia Supernovae -- Implications for the Progenitor and the Explosion Scenario

Type Ia Supernova Nucleosynthesis: Metallicity-Dependent Yields

Implications for the Explosion Mechanism of Type Ia Supernovae from their Late-time Spectra

Ejecta Masses in Type Ia Supernovae—Implications for the Progenitor and the Explosion Scenario*

The progenitors of Type Ia supernovae with asymptotic giant branch donors

A sequence of Type Ib, IIb, II-L, and II-P supernovae from binary-star progenitors of varying initial separation

Cosmic Type Ia supernova rate and constraints on supernova Ia progenitors

An investigation of $^{56}$Ni shells as the source of early light curve bumps in type Ia supernovae

The Progenitors of Superluminous Type Ia Supernovae

Cosmic Type Ia SN rate and constraints on SN Ia progenitors