40. Posterior Corrective Surgery for Type II Congenital Kyphosis: SRS-Schwab Grade 4 Osteotomy or Vertebral Column Resection?

Yong Qiu,Hongru Ma,Benlong Shi,Zezhang Zhu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2024.06.483
IF: 4.297
2024-01-01
The Spine Journal
Abstract:BACKGROUND CONTEXT The rigid nature of anterior or circumferential failure of segmentation in type II CK rendered indispensably radical and risky corrective surgery, raising the question on how to trade-off between safety and effectivity regarding the selection of surgical techniques. Bothe VCR and SRS-Schwab Grade 4 osteotomy were reported to be effective in surgical correction of CK, the optimal strategy in selection of the two techniques were not proposed. PURPOSE To compare the radiographic and clinical outcomes between SRS-Schwab Grade 4 osteotomy and vertebral column resection (VCR) in congenital kyphosis (CK) patients with anterior failure of segmentation (type II) and to analyze the peri- and postoperative complications after SRS-Schwab Grade 4 osteotomy and VCR in this cohort. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING Retrospective study. PATIENT SAMPLE Type II CK patients undergoing vertebral column resection (VCR) in our center from January 2015 to January 2020 were included in Group 1, and those undergoing SRS-Schwab Grade 4 osteotomy during the same period were enrolled in Group 2. OUTCOME MEASURES (1) Segmental kyphosis (SK); (2) Thoracic kyphosis (TK); (3) Thoracolumbar kyphosis (TLK); (4) Lumbar lordosis (LL); (5) Sagittal vertical axis (SVA); (6) Pelvic incidence (PI); (7) Pelvic tilt (PT); and (8) Sacral slope (SS). The quality-of-life metrics were collected via Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-22 questionnaire at preoperation, 3-month follow-up and the latest follow-up. METHODS The radiographic parameters, clinical outcomes, and quality-of-life measures at preoperation, postoperation and follow-up were compared between groups. RESULTS A total of 31 patients (19 patients in Group 1 and 12 patients in Group 2) with an average age of 16.3±10.4 years were recruited. Similar correction of segmental kyphosis was observed between groups (51.1±17.6º in Group 1 and 48.4±19.8º in Group 2, p=0.694). Group 1 had significantly longer operation time (365.9±81.2 vs.221.4±78.9, p<0.001) and more estimated blood loss (975.2±275.8 ml vs 725.9±204.3 ml, p=0.011) as compared to Group 2. Significant improvement of SRS-22 Self Image, Function and Satisfaction domains was observed in both groups during follow-up. The SRS-22 measurements were similar between groups at the latest follow-up. Alert event of intraoperative sensory and motor evoked potential (SEP and MEP) monitoring was observed in 1 patient of Group 2. Both groups had 1 transient postoperative neurological deficit respectively. The incidence of peri- and postoperative complications was higher in Group 1 but not statistically different. CONCLUSIONS Both VCR and SRS-Schwab Grade 4 osteotomy, if selected properly, could provide satisfying radiographic and clinical outcome in type II CK patients during a minimum of 2 years follow-up. Compared to SRS-Schwab Grade 4 osteotomy, patients undergoing VCR procedure might have longer operation time, more blood loss and higher incidence of peri- and postoperative complications. FDA Device/Drug Status This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?