Posterior Corrective Surgery for Type II Congenital Kyphosis: SRS‐Schwab Grade 4 Osteotomy or Vertebral Column Resection?

Hongru Ma,Benlong Shi,Dun Liu,Wanyou Liu,Saihu Mao,Zhen Liu,Xu Sun,Zezhang Zhu,Yong Qiu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/os.14083
2024-05-22
Orthopaedic Surgery
Abstract:Illustration of our selection strategy for SRS‐Schwab Grade 4 osteotomy (A, B) and vertebral column resection (C) for patients with type II congenital kyphosis. Both techniques, if selected properly, could provide sufficient correction of kyphosis and satisfying clinical outcome. Objective Surgical decision‐making for congenital kyphosis (CK) with failure of anterior segmentation (type II) has been contradictory regarding the trade‐off between the pursuit of correction rate and the inherent risk of the osteotomy procedure. This study was designed to compare the clinical and radiographic measurement in type II CK underwent SRS‐Schwab Grade 4 osteotomy and vertebral column resection (VCR), the most‐adapted osteotomy techniques for CK, and to propose the strategy to select between the two procedures. Methods This retrospective observational comparative study evaluated surgical outcomes in type II CK patients underwent VCR or SRS‐Schwab Grade 4 osteotomy at our institution between January 2015 and January 2020. Patients operated with VCR and SRS‐Schwab Grade 4 osteotomy were allocated to Group 1 and Group 2 respectively. Radiographic parameters and SRS‐22 quality of life metrics were assessed at pre‐operation, post‐operation, and during follow‐up visits for both groups, allowing for a comprehensive comparison of surgical outcomes. Results Thirty‐one patients (19 patients in Group 1 and 12 patients in Group 2) aged 16.3 ± 10.4 years were recruited. Correction of segmental kyphosis was similar between groups (51.1 ± 17.6° in Group 1 and 48.4 ± 19.8° in Group 2, p = 0.694). Group 1 had significantly longer operation time (365.9 ± 81.2 vs 221.4 ± 78.9, p
orthopedics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?