AB047. Searching for Factors Relating to Long-Term Survivors of Glioblastoma

Depei Li,Pengfei Xu,Qunying Yang,Chengcheng Guo,Shaoyan Xi,Ke Sai,Zhongping Chen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/cco-24-ab047
2024-01-01
Chinese Clinical Oncology
Abstract:BACKGROUND:There remains controversy in the observed survival of gliomas worldwide, especially for glioblastoma (GBM). The 5-year survival rate ranged wildly, but comparable higher in several Asian countries, such as China showed almost 18% from CONCORD-3 data. Are there any special factors relating to long-term survivors (LTSs)? METHODS:We reviewed our single center real-world data for the last 20 years, of 536 GBM [World Health Organization (WHO) grade 4] patients revealed 5-year overall survival (OS) of 19.1%. We analyzed our GBM patients and searched for possible factors relating to LTSs. We collected tumor samples of 13 LTSs (OS >60 months) and 19 short-term survivors (OS <24 months), and performed whole exome sequencing and transcriptome sequencing. RESULTS:From treatment setting, besides surgical resection, post-operational adjutant treatment (radiotherapy plus chemotherapy) are the most important factor contributing to long-term survival. Whole exome sequencing analysis revealed a higher proportion of mutation signature 19 was associated with LTSs. Analysis of copy number variation (CNV) showed that the LTSs had higher copy number variants at the chromosomal level (P=0.049). At the arm level, the proportion of 19p amplification in the LTS was significantly higher than in the short-term survivors (P=0.001). And in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) GBM dataset, GBM patients with 19p amplification also had a better prognosis (log-rank P=0.04). Based on RNA sequencing (RNAseq) and differential expression analysis, the differentially expressed genes were enriched in hypoxia-related processes, apoptosis, and immune-related processes. CONCLUSIONS:From our single-institution data, the factors relating to GBM LTSs should be both clinical management and genomic alternation which could be potential novel targets be applied to future clinical practice.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?