Prognosis of glioblastoma patients improves significantly over time interrogating historical controls
A Thomas-Joulié,S Tran,L El Houari,A Seyve,F Bielle,C Birzu,F Lozano-Sanchez,K Mokhtari,M Giry,Y Marie,F Laigle-Donadey,C Dehais,C Houillier,D Psimaras,A Alentorn,A Laurenge,M Touat,M Sanson,K Hoang-Xuan,A Kas,L Rozenblum,M-O Habert,L Nichelli,D Leclercq,D Galanaud,J Jacob,C Karachi,L Capelle,A Carpentier,B Mathon,L Belin,A Idbaih,A. Thomas-Joulié,S. Tran,L. El Houari,A. Seyve,F. Bielle,C. Birzu,F. Lozano-Sanchez,K. Mokhtari,M. Giry,Y. Marie,F. Laigle-Donadey,C. Dehais,C. Houillier,D. Psimaras,A. Alentorn,A. Laurenge,M. Touat,M. Sanson,K. Hoang-Xuan,A. Kas,L. Rozenblum,M.-O. Habert,L. Nichelli,D. Leclercq,D. Galanaud,J. Jacob,C. Karachi,L. Capelle,A. Carpentier,B. Mathon,L. Belin,A. Idbaih
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2024.114004
IF: 10.002
2024-05-01
European Journal of Cancer
Abstract:BACKGROUND: Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common devastating primary brain cancer in adults. In our clinical practice, median overall survival (mOS) of GBM patients seems increasing over time.METHODS: To address this observation, we have retrospectively analyzed the prognosis of 722 newly diagnosed GBM patients, aged below 70, in good clinical conditions (i.e. Karnofsky Performance Status -KPS- above 70%) and treated in our department according to the standard of care (SOC) between 2005 and 2018. Patients were divided into two groups according to the year of diagnosis (group 1: from 2005 to 2012; group 2: from 2013 to 2018).RESULTS: Characteristics of patients and tumors of both groups were very similar regarding confounding factors (age, KPS, MGMT promoter methylation status and treatments). Follow-up time was fixed at 24 months to ensure comparable survival times between both groups. Group 1 patients had a mOS of 19 months ([17.3-21.3]) while mOS of group 2 patients was not reached. The recent period of diagnosis was significantly associated with a longer mOS in univariate analysis (HR=0.64, 95% CI [0.51 - 0.81]), p < 0.001). Multivariate Cox analysis showed that the period of diagnosis remained significantly prognostic after adjustment on confounding factors (adjusted Hazard Ratio (aHR) 0.49, 95% CI [0.36-0.67], p < 0.001).CONCLUSION: This increase of mOS over time in newly diagnosed GBM patients could be explained by better management of potentially associated non-neurological diseases, optimization of validated SOC, better management of treatments side effects, supportive care and participation in clinical trials.
oncology