Exploration of Acrylic Functionality in Acrylate Epoxidized Canola Oil As a Sustainable Bio-Additive for Asphalt Modification

Xiujie Quan,Conglin Chen,Tao Ma,Yang Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.137536
IF: 7.4
2024-01-01
Construction and Building Materials
Abstract:Due to the concerns of sustainability, environment, and economy that are associated with non-renewable petroleum-based additives, there has been a growing interest in bio-additives derived from renewable feedstocks. This study investigated the modification effects of two newly developed acrylated epoxidized canola oils (AECOs) with different functionalities in asphalt binders. The microscopic characterizations of the two AECOs were analyzed using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and Hydrogen nuclear magnetic resonance (1H NMR) tests. The results demonstrated the successful synthesis of the two AECOs, with functionalities of 2.49 and 0.72, respectively. Subsequently, the rheological properties of AECO-modified asphalt binders were examined through dynamic shear rheometer (DSR) and bending beam rheometer (BBR) tests. The findings revealed that both AECOs reduced stiffness and significantly enhanced thermal cracking resistance, elastic response, and fatigue damage resistance of the neat asphalt binders. The low temperature and fatigue performance of AECOmodified asphalt binders were found to be inversely related to the acrylic functionality of AECO, while the elasticity of neat asphalt binders was positively correlated to the acrylic functionality of AECO. Notably, both AECOs exhibited a more pronounced softening effect on the 30# binder. Furthermore, the modification mechanism of AECO on neat asphalt binders was explored through FTIR and atomic force microscope (AFM) tests. Interesting findings were noticed that the asphalt binders were chemically reacted with the hydroxyl and acrylate groups of AECO, and this reaction was proportional to the acrylic functionality of AECO. At the end of the study, an environmental and economic analysis was conducted in terms of cost, energy consumption, and CO2 emissions. The results indicated that AECO could reduce the production costs by 28.3 %, energy consumption by 21 %, and CO2 emissions by 20.5 % compared to the commonly used SBS modifier in asphalt modification. The substantial economic and environmental advantages make AECO an attractive alternative for sustainable pavements.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?