Suppression Effects of Different Extinguishing Agents on Vent Gases Fires from Lithium-ion Batteries after Thermal Runaway: A Comprehensive Experimental and Numerical Study

Shilin Wang,Xu Gong,Ruihua Shao,Lejun Xu,Yitong Li,Fenfen He,Qinzheng Wang,Xi Wang,Huaibin Wang,Chengshan Xu,Xuning Feng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.firesaf.2024.104227
IF: 3.78
2024-01-01
Fire Safety Journal
Abstract:During the thermal runaway process of lithium-ion batteries, the release of vaporized electrolyte and combustible gases can lead to the formation of a jet flame, posing a significant fire or explosion risk. In order to deal with the threat of lithium-ion battery vent gas fires to the safety of energy storage power stations, it's crucial to identify effective fire extinguishing agents for lithium-ion battery systems. This study employs a combination of experimental and numerical simulation methods to assess the suppression capabilities of CO2, 2 , N2, 2 , and HFC227ea on vent gas/air premixed flames originating from lithium-ion batteries with various cathode materials. Laminar flame speed of vent gas/air/extinguishing agent premixed flames at specific equivalence ratios were measured using a Bunsen burner device under ambient temperature and atmospheric pressure conditions. Additionally, numerical calculations of laminar flame speed and adiabatic flame temperature were conducted using CHEMKIN-Pro, accompanied by an analysis of the chemical inhibition mechanism of HFC-227ea. The findings reveal that although HFC-227ea may slightly elevate the adiabatic flame temperature at lower equivalence ratios, its overall fire extinguishing efficacy surpasses that of CO2 2 and N2. 2 . These results offer valuable insights for selecting appropriate fire extinguishing agents for energy storage power stations, thereby enhancing the safety standards of energy storage systems.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?