Abstract:Legal judgment prediction (LJP) presents a formidable challenge in artificial intelligence, demanding intricate comprehension of legal texts, nuanced interpretation of statutes, and complex reasoning over multifaceted case elements. While recent advancements in natural language processing have shown promise, existing approaches often struggle to capture the sophisticated interplay between facts, legal principles, and precedents that characterize legal decision-making. This paper introduces LegalReasoner, a novel multi-stage framework that leverages large language models (LLMs) and integrates domain-specific knowledge for enhanced legal judgment prediction. Our approach encompasses four key stages: 1) legal knowledge infusion, where we pre-train an LLM on a vast corpus of legal literature using contrastive learning techniques; 2) case-law retrieval, employing a graph neural network to identify relevant precedents and statutes; 3) multi-hop reasoning, utilizing a transformer-based architecture with a hierarchical attention mechanism to navigate complex legal arguments; and 4) judgment synthesis, where we employ a generative adversarial network to produce coherent and legally sound judgments. We evaluate LegalReasoner on two diverse datasets: the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) cases and the Chinese AI and Law Challenge (CAIL2018). Our framework demonstrates substantial improvements over state-of-the-art baselines, achieving an average accuracy increase of 7.8% across all datasets. Furthermore, we conduct extensive ablation studies and interpretability analyses to elucidate the contributions of each component and provide insights into the model's decision-making process. Our work not only advances the field of automated legal reasoning but also offers a transparent and explainable system that could serve as a valuable tool for legal professionals. By bridging the gap between AI and legal expertise, LegalReasoner paves the way for more efficient, consistent, and fair legal decision-making processes.

Unlocking Authentic Judicial Reasoning: A Template-Based Legal Information Generation Framework for Judicial Views

Enhancing Court View Generation with Knowledge Injection and Guidance

De-Biased Court's View Generation with Causality

LegalReasoner: A Multi-Stage Framework for Legal Judgment Prediction via Large Language Models and Knowledge Integration

Towards Interactivity and Interpretability: A Rationale-based Legal Judgment Prediction Framework.

AgentsCourt: Building Judicial Decision-Making Agents with Court Debate Simulation and Legal Knowledge Augmentation

Explicitly Integrating Judgment Prediction with Legal Document Retrieval: A Law-Guided Generative Approach

Evaluation System for Reasoning Description of Judgment Documents Based on TensorFlow CNN.

Circumstances Enhanced Criminal Court View Generation

DuaPIN: Auxiliary Task Enhanced Dual Path Interaction Network for Civil Court View Generation

A Full-Process Intelligent Trial System for Smart Court

Automatic Text Revision with Application to Legal Documents

LegalDuet: Learning Effective Representations for Legal Judgment Prediction through a Dual-View Legal Clue Reasoning

Automated Argument Generation from Legal Facts

Event Grounded Criminal Court View Generation with Cooperative (Large) Language Models

Research on the Regulatory Path of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Judicial Decision-Making

Automatic Knowledge Graph Construction for Judicial Cases

Judicial Knowledge Reasoning Based on Representation Learning.

Legal knowledge management for prosecutors based on judgment prediction and error analysis from indictments

Knowledge-Centric Templatic Views of Documents

Legal Judgment Prediction with Multiple Perspectives on Civil Cases