Abstract:Massive legal documents have promoted the application of legal intelligence. Among them, Legal Judgment Prediction (LJP) has emerged as a critical task, garnering significant attention. LJP aims to predict judgment results for multiple subtasks, including charges, law articles, and terms of penalty. Existing studies primarily focus on utilizing the entire factual description to produce judgment results, overlooking the practical judicial scenario where judges consider various crime circumstances to decide verdicts and sentencing. To this end, in this article, we propose a circumstance-aware LJP framework (i.e., NeurJudge) by exploring the circumstances of crime. Specifically, NeurJudge first separates the factual description into different circumstances with the predicted results of intermediate subtasks and then employs them to yield results of other subtasks. Besides, as confusing verdicts may degrade the performance of LJP, we further develop a variant of NeurJudge (NeurJudge+) that incorporates the semantics of labels (charges and law articles) into facts to yield more expressive and distinguishable fact representations. Finally, to provide explanations for LJP, we extend NeurJudge to an explainable LJP framework E-NeurJudge with a cooperative teacher-student system. The teacher system is NeurJudge which exploits legal particularities well but lacks explanation capability. The student system is a rationalization method that provides explainability but fails to utilize legal particularities. To combine the advantages of the above methods, we use a transferring function to transfer legal particularities from the teacher to the student, making a trade-off between yielding LJP results and rendering them explainable. Extensive experimental results on real-world datasets validate the effectiveness of our proposed frameworks.

De-Biased Court's View Generation with Causality

Enhancing Court View Generation with Knowledge Injection and Guidance

DuaPIN: Auxiliary Task Enhanced Dual Path Interaction Network for Civil Court View Generation

Interpretable Charge Predictions for Criminal Cases: Learning to Generate Court Views from Fact Descriptions

Unlocking Authentic Judicial Reasoning: A Template-Based Legal Information Generation Framework for Judicial Views

Circumstances Enhanced Criminal Court View Generation

Legal Judgment Prediction with Multiple Perspectives on Civil Cases

AgentsCourt: Building Judicial Decision-Making Agents with Court Debate Simulation and Legal Knowledge Augmentation

NeurJudge: A Circumstance-aware Neural Framework for Legal Judgment Prediction.

FAIR: A Causal Framework for Accurately Inferring Judgments Reversals

Event Grounded Criminal Court View Generation with Cooperative (Large) Language Models

Explicitly Integrating Judgment Prediction with Legal Document Retrieval: A Law-Guided Generative Approach

LegalDuet: Learning Effective Representations for Legal Judgment Prediction through a Dual-View Legal Clue Reasoning

Knowledge is Power: Understanding Causality Makes Legal judgment Prediction Models More Generalizable and Robust

Everything Has a Cause: Leveraging Causal Inference in Legal Text Analysis

Rethinking the Development of Large Language Models from the Causal Perspective: A Legal Text Prediction Case Study

A Circumstance-aware Neural Framework for Explainable Legal Judgment Prediction

Legal Judgment Prediction with Multi-Stage Case Representation Learning in the Real Court Setting

Legal Judgment Prediction with Multi-Stage CaseRepresentation Learning in the Real Court Setting

Unified Detoxifying and Debiasing in Language Generation via Inference-time Adaptive Optimization