Comparison of the Impact of a 6 French GlideSheath Slender® and a Conventional Sheath on Distal Radial Artery Occlusion: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Wei Lu,Tao Chen,Haibo Wang,Anni Yang,Lamei Li,Ganwei Shi,Sheliang Xue,Feng Li,Jianqiang Xiao,Jun Gu,Liuyan Zhang,Xiaofang Liang,Wenhua Li,Gaojun Cai

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2024.07.011

IF: 6.614

2024-01-01

Canadian Journal of Cardiology

Abstract:Background There is a lack of randomized clinical trials investigating whether the 6-Fr Glidesheath Slender (GSS) is superior to the 6-Fr conventional radial sheath (CS) with respect to the early-term incidence of distal radial artery occlusion (dRAO) in patients undergoing coronary angiography (CAG) and/or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) via distal transradial access (dTRA). Methods This was a prospective, single-centre trial of patients who were randomized to undergo CAG and/or PCI with either a 6-Fr GSS or a 6-Fr CS. The primary endpoint was the incidence of dRAO at 24 h postoperatively, as evaluated by Doppler ultrasound. Results A total of 620 patients were included in the study. The baseline patient and procedural characteristics were similar between the two groups. For the primary endpoint, the incidence of dRAO at 24 h after the procedure was 1.0% (3/314) in the GSS group and 3.6% (11/306) in the CS group (RR= 0.266, 95% CI= 0.075-0.943, P= 0.027) according to the intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis. For the secondary endpoints, the incidence of proximal RAO was 0.3% (1/314) in the GSS group and 2.3% (7/306) in the CS group (P= 0.029). Other secondary endpoints, including the puncture success rate, procedural outcomes, other puncture-related outcomes and access-related complications, were not significantly different between the two groups. Conclusion The use of a thin-walled and hydrophilic coating sheath can reduce the incidence of early-term dRAO in patients who undergo CAG and/or PCI via the dTRA.