Abstract:Adjuvants are included in many pesticide spray mixtures to enhance the performance of the applied chemical. Many adjuvants which modify the emulsion or extensional viscosity of the tank-mixture have been found to offer benefits in drift management, primarily by eliminating or reducing the 'Fine' droplets included in the spray with diameters <100-200 μm that can move off-target in unfavorable conditions during ground, airblast and aerial pesticide applications. Among wind tunnel and field studies conducted around the world, there is consensus that while some adjuvants are effective for drift management, the performance varies on a case-by-case basis, requiring verification for each adjuvant which could be achieved through a programme such as certification based on showing a reduction in Fine droplets and/or a reduction in airborne drift. These can be measured in wind tunnel studies according to international standards. This article provides a review of the current science in this subject area, from the approaches to data collection to a review of existing data and regulatory application for encouraging and rewarding the use of appropriate adjuvants that have been demonstrated to reduce airborne spray drift potential and therefore the size of no-spray buffer zones appropriate to protect nontarget sensitive areas from drift exposure. Some adjuvants can offer the same reduction in drift as offered by hooded sprayer retrofits. A drift reduction programme based on adjuvant use could include testing candidate adjuvants for their effect on droplet size and reduction in Fine droplets when sprayed through reference nozzles and compared against sprays without the adjuvant. Testing could also be based alternatively on measurements of drift potential on collectors such as monofilament line in wind tunnel or field studies. Once shown to be effective in reducing 'Fines' or spray drift, adjuvants could be certified and then referenced on pesticide labels and/or regulatory or best management practice schemes to encourage their use and offer reductions in use restrictions or no-spray buffer zone sizes based on drift management. Studies have shown that some adjuvants can reduce pesticide leaching into soils and contamination of groundwater, as well as runoff of active ingredients from plants into the environment. Performance depends on the adjuvant type, the pesticide with which it is used, the soil or plant type, the timing and mass of water input from rainfall and climatic factors. © 2024 The Author(s). Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.

Impacts of Surfactant-Based Adjuvants on Spray Droplet Size, Drift Distance, and Deposition Efficiency

Adjuvant use for the management of pesticide drift, leaching and runoff

Experimental Analysis in Dynamics Characteristics of Impinging Spray by a PFI Injector : from Spray Atomization to Fuel Adhesion Formation

Three-Dimensional Simulation on Drift-reduction of Air-assist Spraying

Effects of operating conditions on droplet deposition onto surface of atomization impinging spray

Effects of Adjuvants on Spraying Characteristics and Control Efficacy in Unmanned Aerial Application

SPRAY DROPLET SIZES FROM AQUEOUS LIQUID SHEETS CONTAINING SOLUBLE SURFACTANTS AND EMULSIFIED OILS

DECEIVING THE ELDERLY: EFFECTS OF ACCESSIBILITY BIAS IN CUED-RECALL PERFORMANCE

Effect of formulations and adjuvants on the properties of acetamiprid solution and droplet deposition characteristics sprayed by UAV

Spraying performance and deposition characteristics of an improved air-assisted nozzle with induction charging

Relationship between deposition properties and operating parameters for droplet onto surface in the atomization impinging spray

Enhanced dosage delivery of pesticide under unmanned aerial vehicle condition for peanut plant protection: tank-mix adjuvants and formulation improvement

Effect of Injection Angle on Drift Potential Reduction in Pesticide Injection Nozzle Spray Applied in Domestic Agricultural Drones

Regulating Droplet Impact and Wetting Behaviors on Hydrophobic Weed Leaves by a Double-Chain Cationic Surfactant

Common channel interoffice signaling: Peripheral maintenance and administration support system

Machine Learning to Predict the Interfacial Behavior of Pesticide Droplets on Hydrophobic Surfaces for Minimizing Environmental Risk

Assemblies Disaggregation and Diffusion Dictated Droplet Impact and Wetting Behaviors on Hydrophobic Surface

Removal of copper from aqueous solution by Ascophyllum nodosum immobilised in hydrophilic polyurethane foam.

Regulating droplet impact and wetting behaviors on hydrophobic leaves using a nonionic surfactant

Effect of airflow angle on abaxial surface deposition in air-assisted spraying

Spray drift evaluation with point clouds data of 3D LiDAR as a potential alternative to the sampling method