Abstract:Defect localization aims to locate buggy program elements (e.g., buggy files, methods or lines of code) based on defect symptoms, e.g., bug reports or program spectrum. However, when we receive the defect symptoms, the defect has been exposed and negative impacts have been introduced. Thus, one challenging task is: whether we can locate buggy program prior to the appearance of the defect symptom (e.g., when buggy program elements are being committed to a version control system). We refer to this type of defect localization as “Just-In-Time (JIT) Defect localization”. Although many prior studies have proposed various JIT defect identification methods to identify whether a new change is buggy, these prior methods do not locate the suspicious positions. Thus, JIT defect localization is the next step of JIT defect identification (i.e., after a buggy change is identified, suspicious source code lines are located). To address this problem, we propose a two-phase framework, i.e., JIT defect identification and JIT defect localization. Given a new change, JIT defect identification will identify it as buggy change or clean change first. If a new change is identified as buggy, JIT defect localization will rank the source code lines introduced by the new change according to their suspiciousness scores. The source code lines ranked at the top of the list are estimated as the defect location. For JIT defect identification phase, we use 14 change-level features to build a classifier by following existing approach. For JIT defect localization phase, we propose a JIT defect localization approach that leverages software naturalness with the N-gram model. To evaluate the proposed framework, we conduct an empirical study on 14 open source projects with a total of 177,250 changes. The results show that software naturalness is effective for our JIT defect localization. Our model achieves a reasonable performance, and outperforms the two baselines (i.e., random guess and a static bug finder (i.e., PMD)) by a substantial margin in terms of four ranking measures.

Illuminating the Gray Zone: Non-intrusive Gray Failure Localization in Server Operating Systems

A General Noise-Reduction Framework for Fault Localization of Java Programs.

Just-In-Time Defect Identification and Localization: A Two-Phase Framework.

FluxRank: A Widely-Deployable Framework to Automatically Localizing Root Cause Machines for Software Service Failure Mitigation

Localizing Failure Root Causes in a Microservice through Causality Inference

FaultInsight: Interpreting Hyperscale Data Center Host Faults

A Lightweight Fault Localization Approach based on XGBoost

A Search Based Context-Aware Approach for Understanding and Localizing the Fault Via Weighted Call Graph

G-Cause: Parameter-free Global Diagnosis for Hyperscale Web Service Infrastructures

Actionable and Interpretable Fault Localization for Recurring Failures in Online Service Systems

Software Fault Localization Based on Network Spectrum and Graph Neural Network

HEAL: Performance Troubleshooting Deep inside Data Center Hosts

Root-Cause Metric Location for Microservice Systems Via Log Anomaly Detection

A fine-grained robust performance diagnosis framework for run-time cloud applications

Generic and Robust Root Cause Localization for Multi-Dimensional Data in Online Service Systems

MicroHECL: High-Efficient Root Cause Localization in Large-Scale Microservice Systems

CauseInfer: Automated End-to-End Performance Diagnosis with Hierarchical Causality Graph in Cloud Environment

Themis: A Passive-Active Hybrid Framework with In-Network Intelligence for Lightweight Failure Localization

Generic and Robust Performance Diagnosis Via Causal Inference for OLTP Database Systems

CMDiagnostor: an Ambiguity-Aware Root Cause Localization Approach Based on Call Metric Data

Diagnosing Application-network Anomalies for Millions of IPs in Production Clouds.