Do we Know the Chemical Bond?

Sebastian Kozuch

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26434/chemrxiv-2024-jq0dj

2024-07-03

Abstract:The chemical bond is the biggest paradigm in chemistry. But at the same it is notoriously complex to define it. Under the assumption that knowing what we do not know makes better students and lecturers, we succinctly describe three approaches to define the bond (energetic, structural, and orbital), their advantages and especially their failures. We propose that these definitions, including their theoretical, practical and even philosophical issues, should be taught to advanced undergraduate chemistry students as an essential introduction to the chemical bond module of quantum chemistry courses. This is a controversial topic due to the lack of consensus in the chemical bond community over this heavily disputed topic and the conflicting pedagogical approach; however, and maybe because of this controversy, the teaching of the definitions of the chemical bond including their open questions and challenges can be positively instructive.

Chemistry

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper discusses the nature and understanding of chemical bonds. The author points out that although chemical bonds are fundamental concepts in chemistry, their definition is complex and the limitations of our understanding are often overlooked in education. The paper proposes three different methods to define chemical bonds: energy method, structure method, and orbital method, while also highlighting the limitations and controversies of these methods.

The author believes that these definitions and their associated problems should be taught in advanced undergraduate chemistry courses to enhance students' comprehensive understanding of chemical bonds, rather than just imparting fixed knowledge. The paper mentions that current teaching methods may give students the impression that we have fully understood chemical bonds, but in reality, even experts cannot fully explain all aspects of them.

The author also presents three "axioms" about chemical bonds, emphasizing their significance as the paradigm of chemistry and our limited understanding of them. The author advocates that by discussing these uncertainties, students' cognitive and metacognitive abilities can be improved.

The paper concludes by discussing three methods based on energy, structure, and orbitals to understand chemical bonds, and points out the advantages and disadvantages of each method, particularly the issues encountered when defining chemical bonds using the energy approach, such as the misconception that there is attraction between all atoms when they are stretched.

Overall, this paper aims to provoke reflection on the teaching methods of chemical bonds and encourage the inclusion of uncertainties surrounding this topic in education, so that students can better comprehend the concept of chemical bonds.