Abstract:BackgroundSystematic reviews have established the short‐term improvements of periodontal regenerative/reconstructive procedures compared to conventional surgical treatment in intrabony defects. However, a hierarchy of periodontal regenerative/reconstructive procedures regarding the medium‐ to long‐term results of treatment does not exist. AimTo systematically assess the literature to answer the focused question "In periodontitis patients with intrabony defects, what are the medium‐ and long‐term benefits of periodontal regenerative/reconstructive procedures compared with open flap debridement (OFD), in terms of clinical and/or radiographic outcome parameters and tooth retention?" Material & MethodsRandomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs), reporting on clinical and/or radiographic outcome parameters of periodontal regenerative/reconstructive procedures ≥ 3 years post‐operatively were systematically assessed. Clinical [residual probing pocket depth (PD) and clinical attachment level (CAL) gain, tooth loss] and radiographic [residual defect depth (RDD), bone gain (RBL)] outcome parameters, were assessed. Descriptive statistics were calculated and Bayesian random‐effects network meta‐analyses (NMA) were performed where possible. ResultsThirty RCTs, presenting data 3 to 20 years after treatment with grafting, GTR, EMD, as monotherapies, combinations thereof, and/or adjunctive use of blood derived growth factor constructs, or with OFD only, were included. NMA based on 21 RCTs showed that OFD was clearly the least efficacious treatment; regenerative/reconstructive treatments resulted in significantly shallower residual PD in 4 out 8 comparisons [range of mean differences (MD): ‐2.37 to ‐0.60 mm] and larger CAL gain in 6 out 8 comparisons (range of MD: 1.26 to 2.66 mm), and combination approaches appeared as the most efficacious. Tooth loss after regenerative/reconstructive treatment was less frequent (0.4%) compared to OFD (2.8%), but the evidence was sparse. There was only sparse radiographic data not allowing any relevant comparisons. ConclusionPeriodontal regenerative/reconstructive therapy in intrabony defects results, in general, in shallower residual PD and larger CAL gain compared with OFD, translating in high rates of tooth survival, on a medium (3‐5 years) to long‐term basis (5‐20 years). Combination approaches appear, in general, more efficacious compared to monotherapy in terms of shallower residual PD and larger CAL gain. A clear hierarchy could, however, not be established due to limited evidence.

Long-term Success and Influencing Factors of Regenerative Surgery for Intra-Bony Defects: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Bone Volume and Height Changes for Lateral Window Sinus Floor Elevation Using Two Types of Deproteinized Bovine Bone Mineral: A Retrospective Cohort Study of 1-4 Years

Long-ferm Clinical Outcome after Reconstruction of Periodontal Defects Using a Bovine-Derived Xenograft:a Retrospective Cohort Study

Radiographic Assessment of Deproteinized Bovine Bone Mineral (DBBM) and Collagen-Stabilized DBBM for Transalveolar Sinus Floor Elevation: A 2-Year Retrospective Cohort Study

Long-term outcome following regenerative periodontal treatment of intrabony defects

Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Bio-Oss Granules and Bio-Oss Collagen in the Treatment of Periodontal Intrabony Defects: a Retrospective Cohort Study

The use of enamel matrix derivative alone versus in combination with bone grafts to treat patients with periodontal intrabony defects: a meta-analysis.

Clinical performance of a regenerative strategy for intrabony defects: scientific evidence and clinical experience

Clinical effectiveness of regenerative periodontal surgery and orthodontic tooth movement with clear aligners in stage IV periodontitis: a case series

Medium‐ and long‐term clinical benefits of periodontal regenerative/reconstructive procedures in intrabony defects: Systematic review and network meta‐analysis of randomized controlled clinical studies

Five-year follow-up of regenerative periodontal therapy with enamel matrix derivative at sites with angular bone defects

Efficacy of periodontal minimally invasive surgery with and without regenerative materials for treatment of intrabony defect: a randomized clinical trial

Clinical Evaluation of Periodontal Intrabony Defects Treated with a Reconstituted Bovine Porous Bone Mineral Containing Bone Morphogenetic Proteins

Retrospective Study on the Clinical Outcomes of Small-Diameter Implants Supporting Fixed Prostheses Without Bone Augmentation in the Posterior Region after 2 to 12 Years

Quantification of growth factors in advanced platelet-rich fibrin and concentrated growth factors and their clinical efficiency as adjunctive to the GTR procedure in periodontal intrabony defects

Five-year results evaluating the effects of platelet-rich plasma on the healing of intrabony defects treated with enamel matrix derivative and natural bone mineral

Long-term results of regenerative treatment of intrabony defects: a cohort study with 5-year follow-up

[Short-Term Outcome of Regenerative Surgery Treating Peri-Implantitis].

Ten-year results following treatment of intrabony defects with an enamel matrix protein derivative combined with either a natural bone mineral or a β-tricalcium phosphate

Healing of two and three wall intrabony periodontal defects following treatment with an enamel matrix derivative combined with autogenous bone

A 10‐Year Follow‐Up of Reconstructive Treatment of Peri‐Implantitis Using Mineralized Dehydrated Allograft and Resorbable Membrane: A Retrospective Case Series