Abstract:The issue of terrorism has become a major topic in the international academic circles and with good reasons.It is extremely difficult to define terrorism.The authors point out that something is wrong with some scholars' methods of defining terrorism.Without a view of the context of globalization,one cannot grasp the nature of terrorism.Contemporary terrorism is a by-product of the globalization process for the time being.In the perspective of cross-cultural relationships,terrorism can be interpreted as some ″non-Western cultures″ fighting back at the globalization strategy of Western cultures,though in an extremist,cruel and counter-humanist way.Corresponding to the manifested cruelty of terrorism,there is the Huntingtonian ″Clash of Civilizations″ which is also rather aggressive.Kofi Annan and Habermas point out that conflict or clash is only one of the various forms of the relations between among cultures.If we neglect the mutual influence,mutual learning and mutual promoting among cultures,and even worse,if we take the clash of cultures as the only possible form of relations between different cultures,it is not only a theoretical error,but will cause a severe realistic outcome as well.However,cross-cultural dialogues proposed by Kofi Annan and Habermas and others are very hard to be carried out though they appear rather necessary.In spite of this,the authors still agree with their attitude and strategy.Counter-terrorism is a concrete and complicated political action,which involves not only the relations between different cultures,but also the political reality in many countries.We should never simplify the issue,as does Huntington.In a word,we must oppose terrorism,but we should never oppose it from the viewpoint of ″Clash of Civilizations″.

Analysis of American Anti-terrorism Strategy in the New Global Anti-terrorism Era

A Control Strategy: American National Cyber Security Policy in Post-9·11 World

A Study on the Post-cold-war Emergence of Russian Anti-Americanism and its Root

The Revival of the Propaganda State

Nuclear Terrorism and the Obama Administration's Nuclear Strategy

The meaning of 11 September and the emerging postinternational world

Post-9/11 Coverage of Terrorism in the New York Times

9/11 and the Advent of Total Diplomacy: Strategic communication as a primary weapon of war

The Impact of 9/11 on Information Policy in the United States: A Current Perspective on Homeland Security and Emergency Management

A Comment on the Effect of the New Af-Pak Strategy

Tentative analysis of the 2010 National Security Strategy report of the United States

Terrorism, public relations, and propaganda

THE BRAND OF THE FREE: A CRITICAL ASSESSMENT OF US PUBLIC DIPLOMACY EFFORTS SINCE 9/11

Introduction: China’s Governance Reform and Crisis Management in Transition

“Call to Arms” Against Iraq: An Analysis of the Rhetoric of U.S. President Bush’s

Untying the Knot? Assessing the compatibility of the American and European strategic culture under President Obama

The Symmetries and Redundancies of Terror: Patterns in the Dark, A study of Terrorist Network Strategy and Structure

America's Anti-Nuclear Terrorism Policies since 9/11

Role of Media in Shaping Public Opinion About War in Afghanistan Post 9/11

Terrorism: The Culture Brutality in the Context of Globalization

How shared ties and journalistic cultures shape global news coverage of disruptive media events: the case of the 9/11 terror attacks