Abstract:In 2022, the tension between Russia and the U.S. has reached a new high. This trend has been especially noticeable in the information space: influencing public opinion of each other’s populations as well as of global community. Focusing on the concept of “political warfare” (POLWAR), the author analyzes the circumstances of its last notable emergence in the discourse among the American expert community and political elites – the start of the Cold War. The article discovers that American approach to the POLWAR in the first decades of confrontation with the USSR was reactive and even defensive, since the USSR did already have a successful experience of projecting influence on the global public opinion, effectively winning hearts and minds of foreign populations and thus presenting a threat to the newly constructed liberal world order. Hence, the U.S. governments proceeded to a gradual establishment of what later will be called the American “public diplomacy” (PD), including the development of relative legislation, institutes, etc. Thus, the article concludes that PD as a political practice may be considered a product of the Cold War in general and POLWAR in particular, which explains why the American PD has been in systemic crisis since the end of the Cold War. Moreover, studying the latest changes in the U.S. legislation and institutes related to public diplomacy, the author suggests that those events were once again the reaction of the U.S. to the Russian policies which were considered a challenge to the “rule-based world order”. Those steps, however, have been too inconsequent to bring the American PD into the most effective mode. That is why in the POLWAR that started in 2022, the American side fluctuates towards reactive and defensive tactic, mostly focusing on stopping Russian information campaigns influencing the population of the U.S., whereas control over the global public opinion remains second priority and public opinion of Russians is not being considered at all within the framework of this new approach of the U. S. Aside from that the creation of Disinformation Board and introduction of the concept of “domestic PD” likely indicate the desire to boost the public diplomacy resources that are not currently adequate for POLWAR offensive via discovering new talents and ideas among motivated Americans.

Terrorism, public relations, and propaganda

The Revival of the Propaganda State

Public diplomacy and propaganda: Rethinking diplomacy in the age of persuasion

US Public Diplomacy in an Age of Propaganda

Public diplomacy in a National Security Context

THE BRAND OF THE FREE: A CRITICAL ASSESSMENT OF US PUBLIC DIPLOMACY EFFORTS SINCE 9/11

Truth and Information Consequences Since 9/11

9/11 and the Advent of Total Diplomacy: Strategic communication as a primary weapon of war

History Rhymes Itself: U.S. Public Diplomacy as a Tool for “Political Warfare”

Counter-Terrorism Strategic Communications: Back to the Future, Lessons from Past and Present

Public Opinion and Cyberterrorism

Propaganda and American Ideological Critique

Public diplomacy and public relations: Will the twain ever meet

Media DevelopmentVol LIV 3/2007

Propaganda in America: How to Recognize and Defend Against It

Organized Persuasive Communication: A new conceptual framework for research on public relations, propaganda and promotional culture

On War, Politics and Capitalism after 9/11

Propaganda and the Web 3.0: Truth and ideology in the digital age

The SAGE Handbook of Propaganda

The Impact of 9/11 on Information Policy in the United States: A Current Perspective on Homeland Security and Emergency Management

Role of Media in Shaping Public Opinion About War in Afghanistan Post 9/11