Relationship Between Cognition and Exercise Capability in Community-dwelling Older Adults: 1815 Board #76 May 31 3 30 PM - 5 00 PM

Chunmei Cao,Yu Liu,Jingmin Liu,Weimo Zhu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0000536494.78408.18
2018-01-01
Abstract:Safe and successful mobility maybe essential to maintain quality of life in independently living community-dwelling older adults. These are high functioning individuals who may encounter precarious situations during their community ambulation increasing their risk for falling and loss of mobility. Loss of mobility in these individuals may have a dramatic impact on their quality of life. Though there are many ways to measure balance and fall-risk in older adults, the Community Balance and Mobility (CB&M) assessment is shown to alleviate the ceiling effects and suggested to be a preferred assessment for balance and mobility in independently living community-dwelling older adults. It is important from a clinical perspective to determine if performance on such a challenging assessment like CB&M is related to having a higher quality of life. PURPOSE: To assess how quality of life is related to mobility and balance performance in community-dwelling older adults. METHODS: An ongoing study of 20 older adults (mean age: 74.1±6.4 years; 10 females) who were living independently in the community participated. Health-related quality of life was measured with 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). SF-36 is a patient-reported survey measuring health status with subscales consisting of physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health, role limitations due to emotional problems, energy/fatigue, emotional well-being, social functioning, pain, and general health. Mobility and balance was measured with CB&M, a performance measure consisting of 13 challenging tasks evaluating mobility and balance performance. Correlation analysis was performed between SF-36 and CB&M scores. RESULTS: The physical function subscale (r = 0.572; p = 0.008) and general health subscale (r = 0.520; p = 0.019) showed significant moderate positive correlations with mobility and balance performance, as assessed by the CB&M. CONCLUSIONS: Community-dwelling older adults with a higher CB&M score attained higher scores on the SF-36 subscales, suggesting that, greater mobility and balance ability is associated with a higher quality of life in independently-living community-dwelling older adults. If dynamic balance can be improved or maintained in older adults, they are more likely to sustain a better health-related quality of life.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?