Association Between Fatigability and Physical Function among the Elderly in the Geisinger Rural Aging Study
James E. Stampley,Brett Davis,G. Craig Wood,Diane C. Mitchell,Gordon L. Jensen,Yi-Hsuan Liu,Xiang Gao,Bethann Whilden,Marianne Yohn,Krystal Cunningham,Megan Lemotte,Christopher D. Still,Brian A. Irving
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0000561678.68871.7c
2019-01-01
Abstract:Elevations in perceived fatigue, fatigability, likely contribute to impairments in physical function in the elderly. However, the independent and combined effects of physical and mental fatigability on physical function in the elderly is unknown. PURPOSE: We examined the cross-sectional associations between physical fatigability, mental fatigability, and physical function among the elderly in the Geisinger Rural Aging Study (GRAS). METHODS: Here, we included 122 (66F, 56M) elderly (≥80 years) participants from the GRAS who completed the Pittsburgh Fatigability Scale (PFS) and PROMIS Physical Function, Short-Form 20a [question pfa11 was excluded due to missing values]. We used multiple linear regression to measure the association between the PROMIS Physical Function Score (19-95) and PFS - Physical Fatigability Score (0-50, no to extreme physical fatigue) and PFS-Mental Fatigability Score (0-50, no to extreme mental fatigue) adjusted for age, sex, BMI, and number of medications used over the past two years. RESULTS: The mean (SD) Physical Function Score, Physical Fatigability Score, Mental Fatigability Score, BMI, and number of medications were 80 (11), 23 (10), 12 (11), 28 (5) kg/m2 and 18 (8), respectively. Low Physical Function Scores were associated with higher Physical and Mental Fatigability Scores in crude models (r = -0.65, p<0.0001 and r = -0.38, p<0.0001, respectively). When Physical and Mental Fatigability Scores were included in the same model, the association between the Physical Function and Physical Fatigability Scores remained significant (r = -0.57, p<0.0001), while the association between the Physical Function and the Mental Fatigability Scores was no longer significant (r = 0.07, p=0.43). Adjustment for age, sex, BMI and number of medications did not change the significant inverse association between the Physical Function and Physical Fatigability Scores (r = -0.65, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that elderly individuals with lower physical function may also have higher physical fatigability independent of age, sex, BMI, and number of medications. Future studies should examine the impact of improving physical fatigability on physical function in the elderly. This study is funded by the USDA, Agricultural Research Service agreement 8050-51530-012-01A