Differential Enantioselectivity of Murine Glutathione S-transferase Isoenzymes in the Glutathione Conjugation of Trans-3,4-dihydroxy-1, 2-Oxy-1,2,3,4-tetrahydrobenzo[c]phenanthrene Stereoisomers.

Xun Hu,Albrecht Seidel,Heinrich Frank,Sanjay Srivastava,Hong Xia,Ajai Pal,Shu Zheng,Franz Oesch,Shivendra V. Singh
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/abbi.1998.0840
IF: 4.114
1998-01-01
Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics
Abstract:The kinetics of the glutathione (GSH) conjugation of (+)- and (-)-enantiomers of anti- as well as syn-3,4-dihydroxy-1,2-oxy-1,2,3, 4-tetrahydrobenzo[c]phenanthrene (B[c]PDE) catalyzed by murine GSH S-transferase (GST) isoenzymes has been investigated. Murine GSTs exhibited significant differences in their enantioselectivity toward B[c]PDE stereoisomers. For example, while pi class isoenzyme mGSTP1-1 was virtually inactive toward stereoisomers with 1S configuration [(-)-syn-and (+)-anti-B[c]PDE], these stereoisomers were good substrates for alpha class isoenzyme mGSTA1-2. When GST activity was measured as a function of varying B[c]PDE concentration (10-320 microM) at a fixed saturating concentration of GSH (2 mM), each isoenzyme examined obeyed Michaelis-Menten kinetics with all four B[c]PDE stereoisomers. Alpha class isoenzyme mGSTA4-4 exhibited negligible activity toward all four stereoisomers of B[c]PDE. The catalytic efficiency of mGSTA1-2 was approximately 1.5- to 15-fold higher than other murine GSTs in the GSH conjugation of (-)-anti-B[c]PDE, which among the four B[c]PDE stereoisomers is the most potent pulmonary carcinogen in the newborn mouse model and a potent skin tumor-initiator. While alpha class isoenzymes mGSTA3-3 and mGSTA1-2 were equally efficient in the GSH conjugation of (+)-anti-B[c]PDE, their catalytic efficiencies toward this stereoisomer were significantly higher than those of mGSTP1-1 and mGSTM1-1. Likewise, mGSTA1-2 was relatively more efficient than other GSTs in the GSH conjugation of both enantiomers of syn-B[c]PDE. In summary, our results indicate that (a) murine GSTs significantly differ in their enantioselectivity in the GSH conjugation of B[c]PDE stereoisomers, which may partially account for the observed differences in the carcinogenic potency of B[c]PDE stereoisomers, and (b) mGSTA1-2 and mGSTA3-3 play a major role in the detoxification of B[c]PDE.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?