An Alpha Class Mouse Glutathione S-Transferase with Exceptional Catalytic Efficiency in the Conjugation of Glutathione with 7β,8α-Dihydroxy-9α,10α-oxy-7,8,9,10-tetrahydrobenzo(a)pyrene

Hu X,Srivastava S K,Xia H,Awasthi Y C,Singh S V
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.271.51.32684
IF: 5.485
1996-01-01
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Abstract:The kinetics of the conjugation of glutathione (GSH) with anti-7 beta,8 alpha-dihydroxy-9 alpha,10 alpha-oxy-7,8,9,10- tetrahydrobenzo(a)pyrene (anti-BPDE) catalyzed by GSH S-transferase (GST) isoenzymes purified from the liver and forestomach of female A/J mouse has been investigated. The GST isoenzymes studied included an alpha class isoenzyme of forestomach (GST 9.5), alpha class hepatic isoenzymes mGSTA3-3 and mGSTA4-4, pi class hepatic isoenzyme mGSTP1-1, and mu class hepatic isoenzyme mGSTM1-1. When the concentration of (+)-anti-BPDE was varied (5-120 mu m) at a fixed GSH concentration (2 mM), linear Lineweaver-Burk plots were observed for each isoenzyme. The k(cat) values for GST 9.5, mGSTA3-3, mGSTP1-1, and mGSTA4-4 were 2.0, 0.02, 0.40, 0.05, and 0.01 s(-1), respectively, with corresponding K-m values of 16, 12, 29, 27, and 49 mu m. The catalytic efficiency (k(cat)/K-m) of GST 9.5 in the conjugation of GSH with (+)-anti-BPDE, which is believed to be the ultimate carcinogenic metabolite of benzo(a)pyrene, was about 9-625-fold higher as compared with other mouse GST isoenzymes. These results indicate that GST 9.5 of forestomach is different among mammalian alpha class GSTs because (+)-anti-BPDE has been shown to be a poor substrate for alpha class rate or human GST isoenzymes. The catalytic efficiency of GST 9.5 was approximately 4.5-fold higher than that of pi class human isoenzyme (hGSTP1-1), which among human GSTs is reported to be most efficient in the detoxification of (+)-anti-BPDE. Unlike rat GST isoenzymes, linear Lineweaver-Burk plots were observed for mouse GSTs when GSH was used as a variable substrate. The catalytic efficiencies of the mouse GSTs toward (+)-anti-BPDE were about 2-20-fold higher as compared with the (-)-enantiomer of anti-BPDE. The results of the present study suggest that GST 9.5 may play an important role in the detoxification of (+)-anti-BPDE.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?