Abstract:Land consolidation (LC) is considered an effective instrument to respond to public demands in rural areas of China due to its evolution from a purely technical policy into a more comprehensive social project. As one of the most important steps in LC, land adjustment has a major impact on its success. Despite the broad heterogeneity of local contexts, land adjustment-related collective action has emerged nationwide as a public good. However, the generalized patterns explaining how and why such examples of local collective action occur remain poorly investigated. This study analyses configurations of the factors that generate land adjustment-related collective action in LC by drawing upon the archetype approach and using a social-ecological systems (SES) framework to conceptually decompose the many details of cases. Based on 34 systematically selected cases from eastern, central, and western China, the results show that there is a set of 23 configurations of factors that bear a causal relationship with collective action in land adjustment. These can be clustered into six archetypes. Some collective action conditions that are well known in the existing literature, such as group size, reciprocity, and trust, are reconfirmed in this analysis. Furthermore, several distinctive implications are drawn from the archetype analysis: 1) Local leadership combined with self-governance convention and institutionalized self-organization or powerful local leadership allied with goal congruence create favorable conditions for the local collective action of self-organized LCPs. 2) Leadership also plays a significant role in facilitating local collective action for land adjustment under government-led and enterprise-led modes as government and enterprises rely on local leadership to avoid the need to contact numerous scattered farmers and to save on transaction costs. 3) While excessive intervention by the government is restrained under self-organized and enterprise-led modes, the archetypes highlight that government participation facilitate local cooperation. 4) The government and enterprises likely engage in rural collective action through divergent mechanisms motivated by their political or economic goals. In general, these findings provide new insights into land-related local collective action and may benefit China and other regions for transition processes towards rural sustainability.

The Effectiveness of Voluntary Collective Action in China's Rural Land Development

The Micro Administrative Mechanism of Land Reallocation in Land Consolidation: A Perspective from Collective Action

Collective action dilemmas of sustainable natural resource management: A case study on land marketization in rural China

Collective Participation in Conservation Easements in Rural China: Evidence from the Qianjiangyuan National Park

Between Social Capital and Formal Governance in Farmer Cooperatives: Evidence from China

Social Capital and the Effectiveness of Land Use Policies: Evidence from Rural China

Collective Action for the Market-Based Reform of Land Element in China: The Role of Trust

Emergence of Local Collective Action for Land Adjustment in Land Consolidation in China: an Archetype Analysis

Collective action improves elite-driven governance in rural development within China

Social Capital, Member Participation, And Cooperative Performance: Evidence From China'S Zhejiang

How do China's villages self‐organize collective land use under the background of rural revitalization? A multi‐case study in Zhejiang, Fujian and Guizhou provinces

A Study of the Mechanisms of Government Embedment and Organizational Environment Related to Supervisory Effectiveness in the Collective Governance of Rural Residential Land

Collective Action in Implementing Top-Down Land Policy: the Case of Chengdu, China

Efficiency and Distribution of Rural Construction Land Marketization in Contemporary China

The Dilemma of Land Expansion and Governance in Rural China: A Comparative Study Based on Three Townships in Zhejiang Province

Collective land system in China: Congenital flaw or acquired irrational weakness?

Land Reallocation and Collective Action in the Commons: Application of Social-Ecological System Framework with Evidence from Rural China

Collective Action In Maintaining Rural Infrastructures: Cadre-Farmer Relationship, Institution Rules And Their Interaction Terms

The Status of Collective Action among Rural Households in Underdeveloped Regions of China and Its Livelihood Effects under the Background of Rural Revitalization—Evidence from a Field Survey in Shanxi Province

Impact of Governance Structure of Rural Collective Economic Organizations on Trading Efficiency of Collective Construction Land of China

The Effects of Land Reallocation on Irrigation Collective Action: Moderating Effects of Informal Organizations and Leadership