IODP Expedition 369 Gas Safety Report

Brian T. Huber,Richard W. Hobbs,Kara A. Bogus,Sietske J. Batenburg,Hans‐Jürgen Brumsack,Rodrigo do Monte Guerra,Kirsty M. Edgar,Trine Edvardsen,Maria Luisa Garcia Tejada,Dennis L. Harry,Takashi Hasegawa,Shannon J. Haynes,Tao Jiang,Matthew M. Jones,Junichiro Kuroda,Eun Young Lee,Yong Xiang Li,Kenneth G. MacLeod,Alessandro Maritati,Mathieu Martinez,Lauren K. O’Connor,Maria Rose Petrizzo,Tracy M. Quan,Carl Richter,Laurent Riquier,Gabriel T. Tagliaro,Carmine C. Wainman,David K. Watkins,Lloyd T. White,Erik Wolfgring,Zhaokai Xu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8008055
2019-01-01
Abstract:This composite report returns data from two different gas chromatograph configurations (GC3 and NGA). Each row combines data from several measurements made on the same sample at the same time for a particular headspace or vacutainer sample. If data do not exist for a particular expedition, the column does not appear. Gas samples were measured by gas chromatography and either flame ionization detection (GC-FID) or thermal conductivity detection (GC-TCD). Reported analytes may include methane, ethane, ethene, propane, propene, n-butane, i-butane, n-pentane, i-pentane, n-hexane, i-hexane, n-heptane, i-heptane, nitrogen, oxygen, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, and hydrogen sulfide. When data are available, methane to (ethane + ethene) ratio (C1/C2�ratio) is reported. To identify individual samples and tests, see each separate analysis (GC3, NGAFID, and/or NGATCD).
What problem does this paper attempt to address?