Abstract:Critical micelle concentration (CMC) is the main chemical–physical parameter to be determined for pure surfactants for their characterization in terms of surface activity and self-assembled aggregation. The CMC values can be calculated from different techniques (e.g., tensiometry, conductivity, fluorescence spectroscopy), able to follow the variation of a physical property with surfactant concentrations. Different mathematical approaches have been applied for the determination of CMC values from the raw experimental data. Most of them are independent of the operator, despite not all of the fitting procedures employed so far can be applied in all techniques. In this experimental work, the second derivative of the experimental data has been proposed as a unique approach to determine the CMC values from different techniques (tensiometry, conductimetry, densimetry, spectrofluorimetry, and high-resolution ultrasound spectroscopy). To this end, the CMC values of five different surfactants, specifically three anionic (sodium dodecyl sulfate, sodium deoxycolate, and N-lauroyl sarcosinate) and two nonionic, such as polyethylene glycol ester surfactants [polyethylenglicol (8) monostearate and polyethylenglicol (8) monolaurate], have been determined by this approach. The "second-derivate" approach provides a reliable determination of the CMC values among all of the techniques investigated, which were comparable to those calculated by the other operator-free routinely methods employed, such as segmental linear regression or Boltzmann regression. This study also highlighted the strengths and shortcomings of each technique over the others, providing an overview of the CMC values of commonly used anionic and nonionic surfactants in the pharmaceutical field, determined by employing different experimental approaches.The Supporting Information is available free of charge at <a class="ext-link" href="/doi/10.1021/acs.langmuir.0c00420?goto=supporting-info">https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.langmuir.0c00420</a>.ESI mass spectra of all surfactants; DSC traces for all surfactants; conductivity vs concentration plot for the anionic surfactants; sound speed vs concentration plot for the PEG8-L surfactant; CMC values calculated by the segmental linear regression method for all surfactants according to the different techniques used and the CMC values calculated by the Boltzmann nonlinear fitting of fluorescence raw data; and fluorescence intensity (peak I/III) vs concentration plots for all surfactants (<a class="ext-link" href="/doi/suppl/10.1021/acs.langmuir.0c00420/suppl_file/la0c00420_si_001.pdf">PDF</a>)This article has not yet been cited by other publications.

Prediction of Critical Micelle Concentration (cmc) of Surfactants Based on Structural Differentiation Using Machine Learning

Machine Learning Assisted Qsar Analysis to Predict Protein Adsorption Capacities on Mixed-Mode Resins

QSPR for the prediction of critical micelle concentration of different classes of surfactants using machine learning algorithms

Structure-based modeling of critical micelle concentration (CMC) of anionic surfactants in brine using intelligent methods

Quantitative Structure-Property Relationships of Surfactants: Prediction of the Critical Micelle Concentration of Nonionic Surfactants

Prediction of the critical micelle concentration of different classes of surfactants using a new topological index

Prediction on Critical Micelle Concentration of Nonionic Surfactants in Aqueous Solution： Quantitative Structure-Property Relationship Approach

Ionic surfactants critical micelle concentration modelling in water/organic solvent mixtures using random forest and support vector machine algorithms

Ionic surfactants critical micelle concentration prediction in water/organic solvent mixtures by artificial neural network

A GNN-Based QSPR Model for Surfactant Properties

Quantifying the Critical Micelle Concentration of Nonionic and Ionic Surfactants by Self-Consistent Field Theory

Estimation of Critical Micelle Concentration of Anionic Surfactants with Qspr Approach

Predicting the Temperature Dependence of Surfactant CMCs Using Graph Neural Networks

Predicting the Temperature-Dependent CMC of Surfactant Mixtures with Graph Neural Networks

Graph neural networks for surfactant multi-property prediction

Surfactant Self-Assembling and Critical Micelle Concentration: One Approach Fits All?

Integrating statistical and experimental protocols to model and design novel Gemini surfactants with promising critical micelle concentration and low environmental risk

Toward A Quantitative Model and Prediction of the Cloud Point of Normal Nonionic Surfactants and Novel Gemini Surfactants with Heuristic Method and Gaussian Process

Machine learning approach for the prediction of surface tension of binary mixtures containing ionic liquids using σ‐profile descriptors