Abstract:Understanding driver behavior of conditionally automated driving is necessary to ensure a safe transition from automated to manual driving. This study aimed to examine the difference in take-over performance between high crash risk (HCR) and lower crash risk (LCR) drivers in emergency take-over situations during conditionally automated driving. In the current simulator study, a 3 x 3 (within-subjects) factorial design was used, including the task factors (no task, reading the news, and watching a video) and time budget factors (time budget = 3 s, 4 s, and 5 s). Forty-eight participants completed a WA drive on an approximately 10 km long two-way six-lane urban road. The participants firstly were in manual control and then switched to the automated driving mode at a speed of 50 km/h. The automated driving system was able to detect a broken car in the ego-lane and requested the driver to take over the control of the vehicle. There are at least one or two other vehicles or motorcycles on each side of the ego-vehicle, resulting in fewer escape paths. For the two non-handheld non-driving-related tasks (NDRTs), the participants were asked to be fully engaged in a task without any need to monitor the road environments. Each participant completed nine emergency take-over situations. The participants were classified into two groups that were labeled LCR (N <= 2) and HCR drivers (N >= 3) according to the number of accidents per driver. The results show that LCR drivers had shorter brake reaction time compared to HCR drivers. For all drivers, the engagement in a task led to longer response times, and the time budget affected the longitudinal vehicle control. In addition, the task affected the response times for LCR and HCR drivers, but only the time budget affected the longitudinal vehicle control for LCR drivers. For all drivers, LCR and HCR drivers, the time budget and task affected the safety of take-over. Especially, the two non-handheld everyday tasks seem to have a similar effect on the drivers' workload. Therefore, the HCR drivers had a lower hazard perception compared to the LCR drivers, and the factor regarding the individual difference of driving ability in take-over situations should be considered to design safe take-over concepts for automated vehicles.

How Various Urgencies and Visibilities Influence Drivers’ Takeover Performance in Critical Car-Following Conditions? A Driving Simulation Study

Effect of low visibility in haze weather condition on longitudinal driving behavior in different car-following stages

Examining the Effects of Visibility and Time Headway on the Takeover Risk during Conditionally Automated Driving

A Study on the Entire Take-Over Process-Based Emergency Obstacle Avoidance Behavior

Understanding Take-over Performance of High Crash Risk Drivers During Conditionally Automated Driving

Drivers' situational awareness of surrounding vehicles during takeovers: Evidence from a driving simulator study

Emergency Takeover under Low Driving Experience: A Study on Driver Performance Analysis and Adaptive Behaviors

Takeover Performance and Workload under Varying Automation Levels, Time Budget and Road Curvature

Behavioral and physiological responses to takeovers in different scenarios during conditionally automated driving

Evaluating Effects of Cognitive Load, Takeover Request Lead Time, and Traffic Density on Drivers’ Takeover Performance in Conditionally Automated Driving

Assessing the Effects of Modalities of Takeover Request, Lead Time of Takeover Request, and Traffic Conditions on Takeover Performance in Conditionally Automated Driving

The Compatibility Between the Takeover Process in Conditional Automated Driving and the Current Geometric Design of the Deceleration Lane in Highway

Analysis of Car Following Behaviors Under Hazy Weather Conditions Based on High Fidelity Driving Simulator

How to Identify the Take-over Criticality in Conditionally Automated Driving? an Examination Using Drivers' Physiological Parameters and Situational Factors

How Does Approaching a Lead Vehicle and Monitoring Request Affect Drivers’ Takeover Performance? A Simulated Driving Study with Functional MRI

Studying Driver’s Perception Arousal and Takeover Performance in Autonomous Driving

Investigating looming tactile takeover requests with various levels of urgency in automated vehicles

Transition in Different Critical Situations: How Non-Driving Related Tasks Affect Drivers’ Physiological Response and Takeover Behavior after Partial Automation Silent Failures

Measuring drivers’ takeover performance in varying levels of automation: Considering the influence of cognitive secondary task

Driving Behavior of L3 Autonomous Vehicle Drivers in Fog Zones under Different Traffic Flow Conditions

Are Novice Drivers Competent to Take over Control from Level 3 Automated Vehicles? A Comparative Study with Experienced Drivers