Abstract:Understanding driver behavior of conditionally automated driving is necessary to ensure a safe transition from automated to manual driving. This study aimed to examine the difference in take-over performance between high crash risk (HCR) and lower crash risk (LCR) drivers in emergency take-over situations during conditionally automated driving. In the current simulator study, a 3 x 3 (within-subjects) factorial design was used, including the task factors (no task, reading the news, and watching a video) and time budget factors (time budget = 3 s, 4 s, and 5 s). Forty-eight participants completed a WA drive on an approximately 10 km long two-way six-lane urban road. The participants firstly were in manual control and then switched to the automated driving mode at a speed of 50 km/h. The automated driving system was able to detect a broken car in the ego-lane and requested the driver to take over the control of the vehicle. There are at least one or two other vehicles or motorcycles on each side of the ego-vehicle, resulting in fewer escape paths. For the two non-handheld non-driving-related tasks (NDRTs), the participants were asked to be fully engaged in a task without any need to monitor the road environments. Each participant completed nine emergency take-over situations. The participants were classified into two groups that were labeled LCR (N <= 2) and HCR drivers (N >= 3) according to the number of accidents per driver. The results show that LCR drivers had shorter brake reaction time compared to HCR drivers. For all drivers, the engagement in a task led to longer response times, and the time budget affected the longitudinal vehicle control. In addition, the task affected the response times for LCR and HCR drivers, but only the time budget affected the longitudinal vehicle control for LCR drivers. For all drivers, LCR and HCR drivers, the time budget and task affected the safety of take-over. Especially, the two non-handheld everyday tasks seem to have a similar effect on the drivers' workload. Therefore, the HCR drivers had a lower hazard perception compared to the LCR drivers, and the factor regarding the individual difference of driving ability in take-over situations should be considered to design safe take-over concepts for automated vehicles.

Takeover Performance and Workload under Varying Automation Levels, Time Budget and Road Curvature

Promote or inhibit: An inverted U-shaped effect of workload on driver takeover performance

Transition in Different Critical Situations: How Non-Driving Related Tasks Affect Drivers’ Physiological Response and Takeover Behavior after Partial Automation Silent Failures

Understanding Take-over Performance of High Crash Risk Drivers During Conditionally Automated Driving

A Study on the Entire Take-Over Process-Based Emergency Obstacle Avoidance Behavior

Measuring Takeover Performance in Different Driving Scenarios: Considering the Influence of Non-Driving-Related Tasks and Takeover Request Lead Time

Effect of Similar Cognitive Secondary Tasks Under Different Levels on Takeover Performance within Various Time Windows for Transition Control from Automated to Manual Driving

Effects of Unreliable Automation, Non-Driving Related Task, and Takeover Time Budget on Drivers’ Takeover Performance and Workload

Assessing the Effects of Modalities of Takeover Request, Lead Time of Takeover Request, and Traffic Conditions on Takeover Performance in Conditionally Automated Driving

Measuring drivers’ takeover performance in varying levels of automation: Considering the influence of cognitive secondary task

Examining the Effects of Visibility and Time Headway on the Takeover Risk during Conditionally Automated Driving

Emergency Takeover under Low Driving Experience: A Study on Driver Performance Analysis and Adaptive Behaviors

Driver takeover performance in conditionally automated driving: sudden system failure situation versus ODD exit situation

Evaluating Effects of Cognitive Load, Takeover Request Lead Time, and Traffic Density on Drivers’ Takeover Performance in Conditionally Automated Driving

How Various Urgencies and Visibilities Influence Drivers’ Takeover Performance in Critical Car-Following Conditions? A Driving Simulation Study

Are Novice Drivers Competent to Take over Control from Level 3 Automated Vehicles? A Comparative Study with Experienced Drivers

The Effects of Lead Time of Take-Over Request and Nondriving Tasks on Taking-Over Control of Automated Vehicles

Take-Over Performance and Safety Analysis Under Different Scenarios and Secondary Tasks in Conditionally Automated Driving

Analyzing the Influencing Factors and Workload Variation of Takeover Behavior in Semi-Autonomous Vehicles

Analysis of Influencing Factors of Level 3 Automated Vehicle Takeover: A Literature Review

How Resource Demands of Nondriving-Related Tasks and Engagement Time Affect Drivers' Physiological Response and Takeover Performance in Conditional Automated Driving.