Abstract:The objective is to provide clear and well-motivated guidance to Machine Learning (ML) teams, founded on our experience in empirical turbulence modeling. Guidance is also needed for modeling outside ML. ML is not yet successful in turbulence modeling, and many papers have produced unusable proposals either due to errors in math or physics, or to severe overfitting. We believe that "Turbulence Culture" (TC) takes years to learn and is difficult to convey especially considering the modern lack of time for careful study; important facts which are self-evident after a career in turbulence research and modeling and extensive reading are easy to miss. In addition, many of them are not absolute facts, a consequence of the gaps in our understanding of turbulence and the weak connection of models to first principles. Some of the mathematical facts are rigorous, but the physical aspects often are not. Turbulence models are surprisingly arbitrary. Disagreement between experts confuses the new entrants. In addition, several key properties of the models are ascertained through non-trivial analytical properties of the differential equations, which puts them out of reach of purely data-driven ML-type approaches. The best example is the crucial behavior of the model at the edge of the turbulent region (ETR). The knowledge we wish to put out here may be divided into "Mission" and "Requirements," each combining physics and mathematics. Clear lists of "Hard" and "Soft" constraints are presented. A concrete example of how DNS data could be used, possibly allied with ML, is first carried through and illustrates the large number of decisions needed. Our focus is on creating effective products which will empower CFD, rather than on publications.

Turbulence Control: from Model-Based to Machine Learned

Closed-Loop Turbulence Control-From Human to Machine Learning (and Retour)

Taming Non-Linear Dynamics and Turbulence with Machine Learning Control.

Turbulence Modeling in the Age of Data

Perspectives on predicting and controlling turbulent flows through deep learning

Machine Learning Control - Taming Nonlinear Dynamics and Turbulence Preface

Machine Learning for Fluid Mechanics

Closed-Loop Turbulence Control: Progress and Challenges

Challenges and Opportunities for Machine Learning in Fluid Mechanics

Deep Dynamical Modeling and Control of Unsteady Fluid Flows

Fast Self-Learning of Turbulence Feedback Laws Using Gradient-Enriched Machine Learning Control.

Turbulence Control Based on Reduced-Order Models and Nonlinear Control Design

Recent Progress of Machine Learning in Flow Modeling and Active Flow Control

An Old-Fashioned Framework for Machine Learning in Turbulence Modeling

Machine Learning Based Fluid-Transportation Monitoring and Controlling

Machine-learning for turbulence and heat-flux model development: A review of challenges associated with distinct physical phenomena and progress to date

Uncertainty Quantification in Computational Fluid Dynamics: Physics and Machine Learning Based Approaches

Physics Based & Machine Learning Methods For Uncertainty Estimation In Turbulence Modeling

An efficient training method to learn a model of turbulence

Uncertainty Quantification For Turbulent Flows with Machine Learning

Enhancing computational fluid dynamics with machine learning