Abstract:This study presents a comparison of the performance of machine learning (ML) techniques, specifically multi-dimensional gene expression programming (MGEP), tensor basis neural network (TBNN), and also proposes a novel universally interpretable machine learning architecture to model the turbulent scalar flux (UIML-s) to enhance turbulence models for fluid flows at different Prandtl numbers in channels with complex shapes of walls in the channel cross section. In particular, peripheral subchannels of rod bundles are of primary interest. However, the accuracy of mean velocity and scalar distributions predicted by commonly used turbulence models still poses a challenge compared to data extracted from high-fidelity eddy-resolving numerical simulations, particularly for engineering applications involving complex geometry flows. In the present study, by utilizing an explicit algebraic expression for the nonlinear Reynolds-stress term obtained through both the evolutionary MGEP optimization and TBNN, the secondary flow structure has been adequately predicted in the cross-wise mean velocity distributions in the square duct and the rectangular channel with three longitudinal rods. This structure is also observed in the data from the concurrent runs performed by direct numerical simulation (DNS) but is completely absent in the results produced by a baseline Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) closure, which employs the linear eddy viscosity model for the Reynolds stress tensor. Comparison of MGEP and TBNN has shown their nearly equal performance in a square duct flow; however, MGEP works better for the more complex geometry channel with three rods. Furthermore, based on the velocity field produced by the RANS-MGEP model, the ML modification of the gradient diffusion hypothesis, integrated into the aforementioned novel RANS-ML model called as UIML-s, significantly improves the mean scalar distributions in a flow with three bumps serving as a prototype for the peripheral subchannel of rod bundle. The normalized root mean squared error decreases from 13.5% to 7.6%, bringing the predicted distributions closer to the DNS data, particularly in the near-wall region. Another approach, MGEP-s, also yields the acceptable results, which are nearly identical to those from UIML-s. These findings highlight the potential of using data-driven calibration of turbulence models with nonlinear closures to enhance the predictability for RANS simulations of fluid flows, heat, and mass transfer in channels with complex geometry.

Machine-learning for turbulence and heat-flux model development: A review of challenges associated with distinct physical phenomena and progress to date

Analysis on Numerical Stability and Convergence of Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes Simulations from the Perspective of Coupling Modes

Analysis on Numerical Stability and Convergence of RANS Turbulence Models from the Perspective of Coupling Modes

Challenges and Opportunities for Machine Learning in Fluid Mechanics

Machine Learning for Fluid Mechanics

Machine learning methods for modeling nanofluid flows: a comprehensive review with emphasis on compact heat transfer devices for electronic device cooling

Machine Learning Methods for Turbulence Modeling in Subsonic Flows Around Airfoils

Recent advances on the numerical modelling of turbulent flows

Using Machine Learning Methods in the Simulation of Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow: a Brief Review

Turbulence Control: from Model-Based to Machine Learned

Enhancing computational fluid dynamics with machine learning

Recent Progress of Machine Learning in Flow Modeling and Active Flow Control

Recent Advances on Machine Learning for Computational Fluid Dynamics: A Survey

Recent Advances in Machine Learning Research for Nanofluid-Based Heat Transfer in Renewable Energy System

Machine learning-based CFD simulations: a review, models, open threats, and future tactics

Machine Learning for Modeling Oscillating Heat Pipes: A Review

Turbulence Modeling in the Age of Data

Physics-informed Machine Learning Approach for Augmenting Turbulence Models: A Comprehensive Framework

Data-driven turbulence modeling for fluid flow and heat transfer in peripheral subchannels of a rod bundle

An Old-Fashioned Framework for Machine Learning in Turbulence Modeling