Improved Estimation of Gross Primary Productivity (GPP) Using Solar-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence (SIF) from Photosystem II

Chenhui Guo,Zhunqiao Liu,Xiaoqian Jin,Xiaoliang Lu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2024.110090
IF: 6.2
2024-01-01
Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
Abstract:Solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) contains contributions from both photosystem I (PSI) and photosystem II (PSII). In theory, SIF emitted from PSII (SIFPSII) should be extracted from at-sensor SIF to quantify photosynthetic CO2 assimilation, as PSI fluorescence yield is nearly insensitive to changes in photochemical yield. In many SIF-related studies, the fraction of chlorophyll-absorbed energy allocated to PSII (beta(2)), a key factor controlling the flux of excitation energy for SIFPSII, is simply assigned a fixed value. However, beta(2) is regulated in response to variations in environmental conditions to avoid an energy imbalance between PSI and PSII. By quantifying the regulating effect of the cytochrome b(6)f complex (Cyt b(6)f) on the electron transport from PSII to PSI, and its interaction with energy dissipation in both photosystems, we develop a framework to estimate beta 2 and PSII fluorescence yield (Phi(F2)), two key determinants for SIFPSII, from SIF emission, PAR, air temperature, the maximum carboxylase activity of Rubisco (V-cmax), and the maximum activity of Cyt b(6)f (JCB6F_max). The framework is equipped with a two-leaf scheme, enabling us to estimate SIFPSII for sunlit and shaded leaves from top-of-canopy SIF observations (SIFTOC). Our simulation results showed that beta(2) and Phi(F2) tend to change in opposite directions with varying PAR, making the contribution of PSII to SIFTOC relatively constant. We compare gross primary productivity (GPP) mechanistically estimated from SIFPSII obtained with fixed (GPP(SIF_F beta)) and dynamic beta(2) (GPP(SIF_D beta)) against the eddy-tower-derived GPP (GPP(EC)) at a winter-wheat experiment site. At a halfhourly time scale, GPPSIF_D beta is better than GPPSIF_F beta, showing higher correlations with GPPEC (R-2 = 0.74 versus R-2 = 0.64 and RMSE = 6.61 mu mol m(-2) s(-1) versus RMSE = 7.67 mu mol m(-2) s(-1)). The study provides a practical way to estimate the contribution of SIFPSII to SIFTOC, giving a better theoretical basis to SIF-based GPP estimation models.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?