Synergy between TROPOMI sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence and MODIS spectral reflectance for understanding the dynamics of gross primary productivity at Integrated Carbon Observatory System (ICOS) ecosystem flux sites
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-1473-2023
IF: 5.092
2023-04-15
Biogeosciences
Abstract:An accurate estimation of vegetation gross primary productivity (GPP), which is the amount of carbon taken up by vegetation through photosynthesis for a given time and area, is critical for understanding terrestrial–atmosphere CO 2 exchange processes and ecosystem functioning, as well as ecosystem responses and adaptations to climate change. Prior studies, based on ground, airborne, and satellite sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) observations, have recently revealed close relationships with GPP at different spatial and temporal scales and across different plant functional types (PFTs). However, questions remain regarding whether there is a unique relationship between SIF and GPP across different sites and PFTs and how we can improve GPP estimates using solely remotely sensed data. Using concurrent measurements of daily TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI) SIF (daily SIFd); daily MODIS Terra and Aqua spectral reflectance; vegetation indices (VIs, notably normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), near-infrared reflectance of vegetation (NIRv), and photochemical reflectance index (PRI)); and daily tower-based GPP across eight major different PFTs, including mixed forests, deciduous broadleaf forests, croplands, evergreen broadleaf forests, evergreen needleleaf forests, grasslands, open shrubland, and wetlands, the strength of the relationships between tower-based GPP and SIF d at 40 Integrated Carbon Observation System (ICOS) flux sites was investigated. The synergy between SIF d and MODIS-based reflectance ( R ) and VIs to improve GPP estimates using a data-driven modeling approach was also evaluated. The results revealed that the strength of the hyperbolic relationship between GPP and SIF d was strongly site-specific and PFT-dependent. Furthermore, the generalized linear model (GLM), fitted between SIF d , GPP, and site and vegetation type as categorical variables, further supported this site- and PFT-dependent relationship between GPP and SIF d . Using random forest (RF) regression models with GPP as output and the aforementioned variables as predictors ( R , SIF d , and VIs), this study also showed that the spectral reflectance bands (RF- R ) and SIF d plus spectral reflectance (RF-SIF- R ) models explained over 80 % of the seasonal and interannual variations in GPP, whereas the SIF d plus VI (RF-SIF-VI) model reproduced only 75 % of the tower-based GPP variance. In addition, the relative variable importance of predictors of GPP demonstrated that the spectral reflectance bands in the near-infrared, red, and SIF d appeared as the most influential and dominant factors determining GPP predictions, indicating the importance of canopy structure, biochemical properties, and vegetation functioning on GPP estimates. Overall, this study provides insights into understanding the strength of the relationships between GPP and SIF and the use of spectral reflectance and SIF d to improve estimates of GPP across sites and PFTs.
geosciences, multidisciplinary,ecology