Operating Area for Modular Multilevel Converter Based High‐voltage Direct Current Systems
Zheren Zhang,Zheng Xu,Wei Jiang,Liang Xiao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-rpg.2015.0342
IF: 3.034
2016-01-01
IET Renewable Power Generation
Abstract:IET Renewable Power GenerationVolume 10, Issue 6 p. 776-787 Special Issue: DC and HVDC System TechnologiesFree Access Operating area for modular multilevel converter based high-voltage direct current systems Zheren Zhang, Zheren Zhang Department of Electrical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310027 Zhejiang Province, People's Republic of ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorZheng Xu, Corresponding Author Zheng Xu xuzheng007@zju.edu.cn orcid.org/0000-0003-1283-6238 Department of Electrical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310027 Zhejiang Province, People's Republic of ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorWei Jiang, Wei Jiang State Grid Fujian Electric Power Research Institute, Fuzhou, 350007 People's Republic of ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorXiaoyu Bie, Xiaoyu Bie State Grid Smart Grid Research Institute, Beijing, 100192 People's Republic of ChinaSearch for more papers by this author Zheren Zhang, Zheren Zhang Department of Electrical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310027 Zhejiang Province, People's Republic of ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorZheng Xu, Corresponding Author Zheng Xu xuzheng007@zju.edu.cn orcid.org/0000-0003-1283-6238 Department of Electrical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310027 Zhejiang Province, People's Republic of ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorWei Jiang, Wei Jiang State Grid Fujian Electric Power Research Institute, Fuzhou, 350007 People's Republic of ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorXiaoyu Bie, Xiaoyu Bie State Grid Smart Grid Research Institute, Beijing, 100192 People's Republic of ChinaSearch for more papers by this author First published: 01 July 2016 https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-rpg.2015.0342Citations: 23AboutSectionsPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat Abstract This study presents a 'seek' and 'check' approach to determine the operating area of the modular multilevel converter based high-voltage direct current (MMC-HVDC) transmission systems. First, the equivalent circuit for analysing the operating area of MMC-HVDC systems is derived and the operating area is represented by discrete operating points. Then, three operating constraints are proposed according to the MMC operation principles, i.e. the voltage, current and voltage stability constraints. Therefore, the determination of the operating area is transformed into checking whether the operating point meets the proposed constraints. The case studies are performed on a one-terminal MMC-HVDC system under six typical short circuit ratios. The results show that the top boundary of the operating area is limited by the voltage constraint, and the bottom boundary of the operating area is limited by the current constraint. The influence of the third harmonic injection and the ac impedance characteristic on the operating area is also studied. Lastly, the validity of the 'seek' and 'check' approach is proved by time-domain simulation results. 1 Introduction With the development of power electronics in recent years, a new generation of high-voltage direct current (HVDC) systems is springing up; and the voltage sourced converter based HVDC (VSC-HVDC) system is one of the most promising technologies. Based on the VSC topology and the pulse width modulation theory, the VSC-HVDC system surpasses the conventional line commutated converter (LCC) based HVDC system, for the decoupled control of active and reactive powers, the low harmonic voltages and the elimination of commutation failure [1-3]. Up till now, the two-level VSC has been widely used in practical engineering applications [4, 5]. However, its use in high-power and high-voltage occasions is limited due to the high switching losses and poor voltage quality. On high-power and high-voltage occasions, the modular multilevel converter (MMC) based topology is a preferred choice, owing to its low power losses, excellent output waveform and flexible scalability [6-8]. Up till now, existing investigations on MMC-HVDC systems mostly focus on the modelling approach, the control method, the modulation strategy and the losses evaluation [9-13]. However, it is still questionable whether the MMCs could operate at all points within the converter maximum MVA rating, although the active and reactive powers of MMCs theoretically could be controlled independently. For the LCC-HVDC system, detailed research has been carried out by International Council on Large Electric Systems (CIGRE) and IEEE, where the concepts of maximum power curves and maximum available power (MAPs) were introduced [14]. However, the power transmission limits of MMC-HVDC systems have not yet been fully addressed compared with the LCC-HVDC systems. Stable operating power limits for the VSC-HVDC system were analysed and evaluated theoretically [15]. By using the Thevenin voltage, the MAP of the VSC is plotted; and the impact on the MAP by the short circuit ratio (SCR) of the connected ac system, the angle of the ac system impedance, the limitation of the converter internal voltage and the reactive power support is also discussed [16, 17]. It has been pointed out that the active and reactive power capabilities of MMCs are not symmetrical [18]. The comparison of reactive power capability with two different sub-module (SM) topologies is also presented in [18]. Based on the active–reactive power capabilities, the steady-state performance of the VSC is analysed in [19]. By optimising the zero-sequence voltage, the circulating current and the average capacitor voltage, the operating area could be extended [20]. The most evident shortage of the operating point analysis in [15-17] is that the results are plotted in curves, not PQ chart, which makes the result not intuitive. Although [18-20] plotted the PQ chart of VSC or MMC, the method on how to determine the operating area (PQ chart) of the MMC-HVDC system is not discussed. Hence, it is still needed to find a general approach for determining the operating area of MMCs. To overcome the aforementioned shortness of the existed work, this paper presents a 'seek' and 'check' approach for determining the operating area of MMC-HVDC systems. Generally speaking, there are two sorts of limitations that constrain the operating area of MMCs, i.e. the limits imposed by the ac system and the converter characteristics. Based on the 'seek' and 'check' approach, the possible operating area is represented by a sufficient number of operating points, and the determination of the operating area is transformed into checking whether the operating point meets the limitations. Consequently, the operating area of MMC-HVDC systems could be determined intuitively. The outline of this paper is as follows. Section 2 introduces the preliminary information, such as the basic structure and operation principles of the MMC. Section 3 discusses the equivalent circuit under fundamental frequency and the modulation index for MMCs. Section 4 analyses the operating area of the MMC-HVDC system, including the equivalent circuit of the MMC-HVDC system, the determination of the operating area and its constraints. Section 5 describes the procedure of the proposed methodology. The case studies have been conducted on a one-terminal MMC-HVDC system in Section 6. Section 7 is the concluding section. 2 Basic theory of MMC The basic structure of the MMC is illustrated in Fig. 1. The converter consists of six arms; the upper and lower arms in the same phase form a phase unit. Fig. 1Open in figure viewerPowerPoint Basic structure of MMC Each arm consists of two parts, i.e. N series-connected identical SM and an arm inductor (L0). The structure of a single SM is also shown in Fig. 1. Each SM is composed of two insulated gate bipolar transistor (IGBT) (T1, T2), two free-wheeling diodes (D1, D2) and a capacitor (CSM). The SM has two states in normal operation: enabled (USM = Uc) and bypassed (USM = 0), where Uc and USM are the voltages of CSM and SM, respectively. By inserting certain number of cascaded SMs, the arm voltage could be determined [9]. In Fig. 1, the neutral points at the ac and dc side are N and O, respectively. The arm power losses are merged as R0; the arm inductor is L0. ipk, ink and ivk are the upper arm current, the lower arm current, and the ac-side current in phase k (k = a, b, c). Udc is the dc voltage, and Idc is the dc current. upk and unk are the upper arm voltage and the lower arm voltage in phase k. uvk is the MMC ac side line-to-neutral output voltage of phase k. Xac is the equivalent reactance between point v and the ac system equivalent voltage source (including ac system equivalent reactance and transformer leakage reactance). As a specific configuration of VSC, MMCs could also control active and reactive powers independently. The steady-state power flowing out of MMC (point v) could be calculated (1)where Uv and Us are the rms. value of the MMC ac side line-to-neutral voltage and the ac system equivalent line-to-neutral voltage, respectively. δvs is the difference of MMC ac voltage phase angle and ac system equivalent voltage phase angle. Pv and Qv stand for the active and reactive powers flowing out of the MMC. 3 Fundamental frequency equivalent circuit and modulation index of MMC From (1), it could be concluded that the reference voltage for the MMC controller is determined according to the demand of the output voltage and its phase angle at point v. However, noticing the voltage drop and the reactive power consumption at the arm inductor, uvk could not be directly controlled by the upper and lower arm voltages. According to Kirchhoff's voltage law, the mathematical model in phase k could be derived as follows (2) (3)Here, define the differential-mode voltage of the upper and lower arms in phase k as udiffk, and the common-mode voltage of the upper and lower arms in phase k as ucomk. Their expressions are as follows (4)Subtracting (2) from (3) gives the following differential equation [21] (5)where icirk is the circulating current of phase k, which is defined as follows (6)Adding (2) and (3) gives (7)where ivk is the MMC ac side current in phase k, which could be calculated as follows (8)For the fundamental frequency components, it is proved that the MMC ac side current distributes equally between the upper and lower arms [22]. Hence, at fundamental frequency, point Epk and point Enk are of the same voltage, and could be virtually connected (denote as a virtual point diff). In this way, at fundamental frequency, the voltage udiffk is not only the difference between upk and unk, but also the voltage at virtual point diff. The single-phase equivalent circuit of the MMC under fundamental frequency could be illustrated in Fig. 2. In fact, the equivalent arm resistance is small enough, and could be omitted in rough calculation [13]. Fig. 2Open in figure viewerPowerPoint Single-phase equivalent circuit of MMC under fundamental frequency Since the voltage udiffk at the virtual point diff could be directly controlled by the upper arm voltage upk and lower arm voltage unk, it is reasonable to choose the virtual point diff as the reference point for voltage control. Then, the modulation index could be defined as the amplitude of the phase voltage at the virtual point diff divided by Udc/2 (9)where Udiffm is the amplitude of the line-to-neutral voltage (fundamental component) at the virtual point diff. Obviously, the modulation index could also be regarded as the amplitude of the differential-mode voltage in any phase divided by Udc/2. 4 Analysis of operating area for MMC-HVDC systems 4.1 Equivalent circuit of MMC-HVDC systems under fundamental frequency The operating area of an MMC-HVDC system is the variation range of the active and reactive powers that flows out of the converter. A one-terminal MMC-HVDC system model as plotted in Fig. 3 is taken as an example for this analysis [23, 24]. Fig. 3Open in figure viewerPowerPoint Single-phase equivalent circuit of an MMC-HVDC system under fundamental frequency As plotted in Fig. 3, the connected ac system is represented by an equivalent voltage source Us and equivalent impedance Zsys (Zsys = Rsys + jXsys). The converter ac bus is point of common coupling (PCC), and its fundamental frequency voltage phasor is denoted as Upcc. Ps + jQs indicates the power flowing into the connected ac system at PCC. The fundamental frequency reactance of the transformer leakage inductance is plotted as XT. The MMC is replaced by its equivalent circuit under fundamental frequency as plotted in Fig. 2, and the output ac voltage phasor at point diff is denoted as Udiff. Xlink is the connecting reactance between PCC and point diff, which could be calculated as follows (10)where XL0 is the arm reactance under fundamental frequency. XΣ(XΣ = Xsys + Xlink) is the equivalent reactance between the ac system equivalent voltage source and point diff. For simplicity, the following analysis is based on the per unit value. For the voltages at the primary side and the secondary side of the transformer, the voltage base values are selected as the transformer nominal voltage at the primary side and the secondary side, respectively. Since the ac side output power capacity of the MMC is measured from point v, the base power value is chosen as the rated power capacity at point v (also the rated power of the MMC). With the aforementioned assumptions, the SCR of the connected ac system (denoted as λSCR) could be expressed as follows (11)The active power and reactive power injecting into the ac system at PCC could be calculated as follows based on the equivalent circuit in Fig. 3(12) (13) (14)The active power and reactive power flowing from point diff could be calculated as follows (15) (16)As pointed out in [16], the active power injecting into the ac system could not exceed the SCR of the ac system too much. However, there arises another question that how could the reactive power vary when the active power is below its upper limit. 4.2 Determination of operating area for MMC-HVDC systems Generally speaking, the equivalent voltage source and the equivalent impedance of the connected ac system could be regarded as constant under a certain operation mode. To describe the operating area of the MMC-HVDC systems, the active power Pv and the reactive power Qv at point v are chosen as the intermediate variables in this paper. Suppose the active power Pv and the reactive power Qv are already known, the relationship between the voltage phasor at point v and the voltage phasor at PCC could be directly obtained according to Kirchhoff's voltage law (17)Assume , (17) could be expanded into another form as follows (18)The d-axis and q-axis voltage component could be calculated after making both the real part and the imaginary part equal to zero (19)If there exist real roots in (19), the MMC-HVDC systems could output a complex power Pv + jQv at point v under a certain ac system operation condition. After calculating the voltage phasor at point v, the voltage Udiff of the virtual point diff, the complex power at PCC and point diff could be derived as follows (20) (21) (22)For practical MMC-HVDC projects, some constraints should also be included as follows. 4.3 Voltage stability constraint Similar to the LCC-based HVDC system, the voltage stability constraint of the MMC-HVDC system could be analysed based on a simplified ac/dc system representation as plotted in Fig. 4. In Fig. 4, Iv is the MMC ac side rms current. The typical characteristic (P–V nose curve [16]) of the aforementioned system are plotted in Fig. 5, where all the results are normalised. Fig. 4Open in figure viewerPowerPoint Simplified ac/dc system for voltage stability analysis Fig. 5Open in figure viewerPowerPoint Characteristics of the simplified ac/dc system It could be noted in Fig. 5 that the P–V curve could be divided into two parts by the point where Ps reaches its maximum value. The upper part is coloured blue, and the lower part is coloured red. From Fig. 5 it could also be noted that there might be two different operating points (point A and point B) for a certain given value of delivered power. The one on the top (point A) corresponds to the normal operating point, and the other one (point B) corresponds to the abnormal operating point [25]. Compared with each other, voltage Udiff of point B is lower than that of point A. On the basis of the analysis above, the method for seeking the operating points that satisfies with the voltage stability constraint is proposed for the MMC-HVDC systems in this paper: If Δ in (19) is negative, there would be no real roots in (19). Therefore, the MMC-HVDC system could not work stably at this operating point, and the voltage stability is violated at this operating point. If Δ in (19) is positive, there would be two possible Udiff according to (19) and (20). The MMC-HVDC system is supposed to operate at a larger Udiff, and this operating point inevitably satisfies with the voltage stability constraint. After seeking the possible operating points of the MMC-HVDC system, the rationality of these operating points should be checked by the voltage constraint and the current constraint. 4.4 Voltage constraint On the basis of the single-phase equivalent circuit plotted in Fig. 2, it is noted that the upper arm voltage and the lower arm voltage of phase k could be expressed as (23) (24)To keep the MMC controllable means that the arm voltage, which is integrated in staircase form by the series-connected SMs, could generate arbitrary voltage from (0.5Udc + Udiffm) to (0.5Udc− Udiffm). For MMCs made up of half-bridge SMs (HBSMs) as plotted in Fig. 1, the minimum arm voltage is always positive or zero, since the HBSMs could only output Uc and 0. To increase the fundamental component of the MMC ac side output voltage and extend the operating area of the MMC, the third harmonic injection could also be introduced. By adding a third harmonic component, whose magnitude is 1/6 of the fundamental one, the maximum modulation index could reach without over-modulation. Therefore, the voltage constraint of MMC-HVDC systems could be generalised based on the modulation index m(25a)or (25b)where (25a) is the voltage constraint of the MMC without third harmonic injection, and (25b) is the voltage constraint of the MMC with third harmonic injection. 4.5 Current constraint To protect the semiconductors from over current, an additional current limiter is also included in the current controller. The objective of this inherent controller is to keep the current order requested by the control system within the rated current of the MMC. As a specific configuration of VSC-HVDC systems, the MMC-HVDC system also uses a vector control strategy that calculates a time-domain voltage which is required to change the current from present value to the reference value. The dq-frame current orders to the controller are calculated from preset powers and voltages. The inner decoupled current controller permits controlling the converter ac voltage that will be used to generate the modulated switching pattern [26]. The reference current signals are originally generated in the dq-frame. According to the calculation results in [27], the rms current loadings of the semiconductor devices in a SM are not the same, and the maximum rms current loading of each semiconductor device occurs at different load angles. However, the dq-frame current is in proportion to, or has positive correlation with the rms current passing through the semiconductor devices in the sight of the apparent power at point v. Therefore, the magnitudes of the dq-frame current references should be applied to a current limiter block. As a typical limiting scheme, the magnitude of the converter current is limited to Imax, as plotted in Fig. 6 as a circle. If the reference current (id and iq) locates outside the designed boundary (point O), the current controller would generate new orders (id′ and iq′) within the boundary (point O′) [26, 28]. This widely used method limits currents in the d and q frame, and it is convenient in implementation. This limiting function not only limits the converter current during normal operation but also limits the converter contribution to faults in the ac system. Fig. 6Open in figure viewerPowerPoint Current limiting scheme in current vector control Transforming the d-axis and q-axis current into abc-axis, the current constraint based on the MMC ac output voltage and power is proposed for simplicity as (26)where IvN is the normalised rated ac side fundamental frequency current of the MMC (pu value). 5 Procedure for operating area determination based on 'seek' and 'check' approach Procedures to determine the operating area of the MMC-HVDC system based on the 'seek' and 'check' approach are described as follows and the flowchart of these procedures are generalised in Fig. 7: Step 1: Suppose the rated MMC apparent power at point v is denoted as SvN, the MMC theoretically could operate arbitrarily when , without exceeding the power capability rating of the MMC. Divide this region in the PQ chart into small pieces, and each piece is represented by the respective operating point Pv + jQv. For each operating point, repeat Step 2–Step 4. Step 2: Solve the voltage phasor at point v based on (19), and calculate Udiff according to (20). If there are no real roots in (19), omit this operating point, since the MMC-HVDC system could not operate at such an operating point. If there are two real roots in (19), the MMC-HVDC system is supposed to operate at the larger Udiff, and this operating point inevitably satisfies with the voltage stability constraint. However, the rationality of this operating point still needs verification. Step 3: Check the rationality of this operating point based on the voltage constraint and the current constraint as mentioned in Section 4.2. If the voltage constraint and the current constraint of the concerned operating point are both satisfied, the MMC could operate at this operation point. Step 4: Calculate the active power and reactive power at PCC and point diff. After checking the rationality of all possible operating points, the area covered by the reasonable operating points (Ps and Qs, Pv and Qv, Pdiff and Qdiff) in the PQ chart forms the operating area of the MMC-HVDC system. Fig. 7Open in figure viewerPowerPoint Flowchart of the proposed procedure for determining the operating area 6 Case studies The case studies are carried on a one-terminal MMC-HVDC system as plotted in Fig. 3. To give general conclusions, the voltages, currents and powers in the test system are all normalised. For the voltages at the secondary side of the transformer, the base value is chosen as the rated voltage of the transformer secondary side; at the transformer primary side, the voltage base value is selected as the rated voltage at this side. The base value of the dc side line-to-neutral voltage is the peak value of the rated line-to-neutral voltage at the transformer secondary side. The base power is supposed as the rated capacity of the MMC. The modulation index reaches 1 when the power flowing from PCC into an ideal voltage source of Us is (0.0 + j1.0) pu. After normalisation, the main circuit parameters (pu value) of the test system are listed in Table 1. In this case, the third harmonic injection is not activated, and the maximum modulation index is 1. Table 1. Normalised main circuit parameters of the MMC-HVDC system Item Values ac system equivalent voltage source Us 1.1 pu ac system equivalent impedance angle α 90.0° transformer leakage reactance XT 0.1 pu arm reactance XL0 0.2 pu dc side pole to ground voltage Udc/2 1.27 pu MMC ac side rated current IVN 1.0 pu rated apparent power at point v 1.0 pu 6.1 Influence by SCR and three constraints on the operating area On the basis of the procedure mentioned in Section 5, the operating area of Ps and Qs, Pv and Qv, Pdiff and Qdiff are outlined in Figs. 8-10, where the SCR varies from 10 to 1. The 1 pu range in the PQ chart is highlighted as the dashed line. The separate effects of the voltage constraint and the current constraint are also presented in the figures. Fig. 8Open in figure viewerPowerPoint Operating area at point diff under different SCRs a λSCR = 10 b λSCR = 6 c λSCR = 3 d λSCR = 2 e λSCR = 1.5 f λSCR = 1 Fig. 9Open in figure viewerPowerPoint Operating area at point v under different SCRs a λSCR = 10 b λSCR = 6 c λSCR = 3 d λSCR = 2 e λSCR = 1.5 f λSCR = 1 Fig. 10Open in figure viewerPowerPoint Operating area at PCC under different SCRs a λSCR = 10 b λSCR = 6 c λSCR = 3 d λSCR = 2 e λSCR = 1.5 f λSCR = 1 As plotted in Figs. 8-10, there are three parts of the operating area. Area 1 is the operating area which satisfies with both the voltage constraint and the current constraint. Area 2, which locates above the top of Area 1, is the operating area where only the voltage constraint is violated. Area 3, which locates under the bottom of Area 1, is the operating area where only the current constraint is violated. Generally speaking, the operating areas at point diff is 'higher' than those at point v and at PCC, since the reference direction of the power flow is from point diff to PCC, and the reactive power in the reference direction at point diff is inevitable larger than those at point v and PCC under the same operation point. From the calculated results, it is noted that Area 1 reduces with the decrease of λSCR, and the maximum active power transmission capability is closely related to the current constraint. When λSCR>3, the MMC could always transmit a maximum active power of 1 pu without violating the current constraint. When λSCR ≤ 3, MMC is not capable of transmitting an active power of 1 pu, and the current constraint would be violated if the MMC tries to transmit an active power more than its maximum active power transmission capability. 6.2 Shape of the operating area It is generally considered that the MMC could output a larger reactive power with a smaller output active power. However, as plotted in Fig. 8, the top boundary of Area 1 is concave. To explain this phenomenon, the operating area (Area 1) in Fig. 8b is taken as an example, and replotted as Fig. 11. Fig. 11Open in figure viewerPowerPoint Operating area at point diff when λSCR = 6 The phase angle of Udiff is set as zero for simplicity in the analysis. As plotted in Fig. 12, it is noted that the ac system equivalent voltage could be calculated as follows (27) Fig. 12Open in figure viewerPowerPoint Voltage phasors of point A′ and point B′ As pointed out in the above paragraphs, the output reactive power at point A′ and point B′' is limited by the voltage constraint. Since the voltage at point diff reaches its maximum value, the voltage phasors at point A′ and point B′ could be plotted as shown in Fig. 12. At point A′, δU equals zero according to (27); Us and Udiff are of the same phase angle. At point B′, Pdiff is positive, so δU is positive. Thus, Us lags Udiff a certain angle, and ΔU(B′) > ΔU(A′). According to (27), the output reactive power is larger at point B′ than at point A′, which indicates that the top boundary of Area 1 is concave. 6.3 Influence of third harmonic injection on the operating area This section discusses the influence of the third harmonic injection. As mentioned in Section 4.2, the voltage constraint should be described as (25b) after applying the third harmonic injection. When λSCR = 2 and considering the three constraints mentioned in Section 4.2, the operating area with and without the third harmonic injection is plotted in Fig. 13. Fig. 13Open in figure viewerPowerPoint Operating area with and without the third harmonic injection In Fig. 13, Area 1′ is the operating area without the third harmonic injection; (Area 1′+ Area 2′) is the operating area with the third harmonic injection. After applying the third harmonic injection, the maximum allowed modulation index increases from 1 to . As pointed out in Section 6.1, the positive reactive power transmission capability is limited by the voltage constraint, and the positive reactive power transmission capability could be extended if the maximum allowed modulation index is increased, which coincides with the calculated results. However, the use of the third harmonic injection does not influence the active power and negative reactive power transmission capabilities. 6.4 Influence of ac impedance characteristics on the operating area The ac impedance characteristic is studied by changing the ac impedance angle, and the calculation is based on three different values of Rsys/Xsys (0, 0.125, 0.25). The operating area is plotted in Fig. 14 when λSCR = 2 and considering the three constraints mentioned in Section 4.2. Fig. 14Open in figure viewerPowerPoint Operating area under different Rsys/Xsys a Rsys/Xsys = 0 b Rsys/Xsys = 0.125 c Rsys/Xsys = 0.25 From Fig. 14 it is noted that the increase of Rsys/Xsys changes the operating area. Intuitively, the operating area 'rotates' clockwise when the value of Rsys/Xsys increases. Under small SCRs (when the MMC-HVDC system is not capable of transmitting 1 pu active power), the increase of Rsys/Xsys would decrease maximum negative active power transmission capability and increase the maximum positive active power transmission capability. Besides, the positive reactive power transmission capability would increase with the increase of Rsys/Xsys, and the negative reactive power transmission capability is not significantly influenced by the change of Rsys/Xsys. 6.5 Simulation verification The simulation model of a one-terminal MMC-HVDC system is built based on the time simulation software PSCAD/EMTDC. The main circuit parameters are listed in Table 2, which coincides with the pu value in Table 1. Besides, the third harmonic injection is not included in the simulation model. An ideal dc voltage source of 400 kV is connected between the positive pole and the negative pole, and the MMC-HVDC system regulates its active power and reactive power at PCC. Table 2. Main circuit parameters of the simulated MMC-HVDC system Item Values ac system equivalent voltage source Us 242 kV ac system equivalent impedance angle α 90° short circuit ratio λSCR 1.5 transformer leakage inductance XT 29.7 mH arm inductance XL0 59.3 mH dc side pole to ground voltage Udc/2 ±200 kV rated apparent power at point v 400 MVA rated transformer ratio 220 kV/193 kV total number of SM per arm N 100 rated voltage of SM capacitor UCN 4 kV Two typical operating points are simulated. One operating point (Point 1 for short) locates at the bottom boundary of Area 1 in Fig. 10e; the active power and reactive power are, respectively, −0.51 and −0.30 pu. After operating in the steady state for a certain time, the system enters another operating point just outside Area 1 (Point 2 for short) at 3 s. The active power and reactive power of Point 2 are chosen as −0.51 and −0.31 pu. The amplitude of the fundamental voltage component at point diff, the d–q axis components and the magnitude of MMC ac side current (pu value), the active power and reactive power (pu value) at PCC are plotted in Fig. 15. Fig. 15Open in figure viewerPowerPoint Simulation verification of operating area a Amplitude of fundamental voltage component at point diff b Active power and reactive power (pu value) at PCC c d–q axis components of MMC ac side output current d Magnitude of MMC ac side output current According to Fig. 10e, Point 1 locates just at the bottom boundary of Area 1, and does not violate the voltage constraint and the current constraint. From Fig. 15 it is noted that both the voltage constraint and the current constraint are not violated at Point 1, and the MMC-HVDC system could operate stably. After changing the reactive power from −0.30 to −0.31 pu, it is noted that the MMC-HVDC system could not operate stably. According to the calculated results in Fig. 10e, Point 2 locates outside of Area 1, and there are no real roots in (19). Hence, this example verifies the proposed 'seek' and 'check' approach. 7 Conclusions This paper presented a method for operating area determination based on a 'seek' and 'check' approach for MMC-HVDC systems. With this method, the possible operating area is represented by some operating points, and the determination of operating area is transformed into checking whether the operating point meets the voltage, current and voltage stability constraints. Based on a one-terminal MMC-HVDC system, the operating area is analysed with the proposed method under different SCRs. The results show that under large SCRs, MMC-HVDC systems could transmit a maximum active power of 1 pu when λSCR is larger than 3. The top boundary of the operating area is limited by the voltage constraint, and the bottom boundary of the operating area is limited by the current constraint. The third harmonic injection can extend the positive reactive power transmission range, and the ac impedance angle would influence both the maximum active and reactive power transmission capabilities. 8 Acknowledgment This paper was supported by the Headquarters Research Projects of State Grid Corporation of China (SGCC-HRP031-2015). 9 References 1Flourentzou, N., Agelidis, V.G., Demetriades, G.D.: 'VSC-based HVDC power transmission systems: an overview', IEEE Trans. Power Electron., 2009, 24, (3), pp. 592– 602 (doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/TPEL.2008.2008441) 2Bahrman, M.P., Johnson, B.K.: 'The ABCs of HVDC transmission technologies', IEEE Power Energy Mag., 2007, 5, (2), pp. 32– 44 (doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/MPAE.2007.329194) 3Yazdani, A., Iravani, R.: ' Voltage-sourced converters in power systems' ( IEEE/Wiley, New York, 2010) 4Eriksson, K.: ' Operational experience of HVDC Light™'. Seventh Int. Conf. on AC–DC Power Transmission, November 2001, pp. 205– 210 5Friedrich, K.: ' Modern HVDC PLUS application of VSC in modular multilevel converter topology'. 2010 IEEE Int. Symp. on Industrial Electronics, Bari, Italy, July 2010, pp. 3807– 3810 6Marquardt, R.: ' Stromrichterschaltungen mit verteilten Energiespei-chern'. German Patent, DE10103031A1, 24 January 2001 7Allebrod, S., Hamerski, R., Marquardt, R.: ' New transformerless, scalable modular multilevel converters for HVDC-transmission'. IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conf., 2008, PESC 2008, 2008, pp. 174– 179 8Peralta, J., Saad, H., Dennetiere, S., et al: 'Detailed and averaged models for a 401-level MMC-HVDC system', IEEE Trans. Power Deliv., 2012, 27, (3), pp. 1501– 1508 (doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRD.2012.2188911) 9Tu, Q., Xu, Z., Xu, L.: 'Reduced switching-frequency modulation and circulating current suppression for modular multilevel converters'', IEEE Trans. Power Deliv., 2011, 26, (3), pp. 2009– 2017 (doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRD.2011.2115258) 10Liu, S., Xu, Z., Hua, W., et al: 'Electromechanical transient modeling of modular multilevel converter based multi-terminal HVDC systems', IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2014, 29, (1), pp. 82– 83 (doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2013.2278402) 11Rohner, S., Bernet, S., Hiller, M., et al: 'Modulation, losses, and semiconductor requirements of modular multilevel converters', IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., 2010, 57, (8), pp. 2633– 2642 (doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2009.2031187) 12Liu, G., Xu, Z., Xue, Y., et al: 'Optimized control strategy based on dynamic redundancy for the modular multilevel converter', IEEE Trans. Power Electron., 2015, 30, (1), pp. 339– 348 (doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/TPEL.2014.2305663) 13Zhang, Z., Xu, Z., Xue, Y.: 'Valve losses evaluation based on piecewise analytical method for MMC -HVDC links', IEEE Trans. Power Deliv., 2014, 29, (3), pp. 1354– 1362 (doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRD.2014.2304724) 14Krishayya, P.C.S., Adapa, R., Holm, M.: ' IEEE guide for planning DC links terminating at ac locations having low short-circuit capacities, part I: AC/DC system interaction phenomena' ( CIGRE, France, 1997) 15Konishi, H., Takahashi, C., Kishibe, H., et al: ' A consideration of stable operating power limits in VSC-HVDC systems'. Seventh Int. Conf. on AC–DC Power Transmission, 2001, 2001, pp. 102– 106 16Zhou, J.Z., Gole, A.M.: ' VSC transmission limitations imposed by ac system strength and ac impedance characteristics'. 10th IET Int. Conf. on AC and DC Power Transmission, 2012, pp. 1– 6 17Zhou, J.Z., Gole, A.M.: ' Rationalization of DC power transfer limits for VSC transmission'. 11th IET Int. Conf. on ac and DC Power Transmission, 2015, pp. 1– 6 18Barker, C.D., Kirby, N.M.: ' Reactive power loading of components within a modular multi-level HVDC VSC converter'. 2011 IEEE Electrical Power and Energy Conf. (EPEC), 2011, pp. 86– 90 19Adam, G.P., Anaya-Lara, O., Burt, G.: ' Steady-state and transient performance of DC transmission systems based on HVDC technology'. Ninth IET Int. Conf. on AC and DC Power Transmission, 2010, ACDC, 2010, pp. 1– 5 20Norrga, S., Ängquist, L., Jlves, K.: ' Operating region extension for multilevel converters in HVDC applications by optimisation methods'. 10th IET Int. Conf. on AC and DC Power Transmission (ACDC 2012), 4–5 December 2012, pp. 1– 6 21Guan, M., Xu, Z.: 'Modeling and control of a modular multilevel converter-based HVDC system under unbalanced grid conditions', IEEE Trans. Power Electron., 2012, 27, (12), pp. 4858– 4867 (doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/TPEL.2012.2192752) 22Xiao, H., Xu, Z., Xue, Y., et al: 'Theoretical analysis of the harmonic characteristics of modular multilevel converters', Sci.China Technol. Sci., 2013, 56, (11), pp. 2762– 2770 (doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-013-5331-1) 23Song, Q., Liu, W., Li, X., et al: 'A steady-state analysis method for a modular multilevel converter', IEEE Trans. Power Electron., 2013, 28, (8), pp. 3702– 3713 (doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/TPEL.2012.2227818) 24Ludois, D.C., Venkataramanan, G.: ' Simplified dynamics and control of modular multilevel converter based on a terminal behavioral model'. 2012 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE), 15–20 September 2012, pp. 3520– 3527 25Kundur, P.: ' Power system stability and control' ( McGraw-Hill, New York, 1994) 26Vrana, T.K., Yang, Y., Jovcic, D., et al: ' The CIGRE B4 DC grid test system', CIGRE Electra Magazine, 2013 27Modeer, T., Nee, H.P., Norrga, S.: ' Loss comparison of different sub-module implementations for modular multilevel converters in HVDC applications'. Proc. 14th European Conf. on Power Electronics and Applications, 2011, pp. 1– 7 28Moustafa, M.M.Z.: 'Operating limits and dynamic average-value modelling of VSC-HVDC systems'. PhD thesis, University of Manitoba, 2011 Citing Literature Volume10, Issue6July 2016Pages 776-787 FiguresReferencesRelatedInformation