ASO Visual Abstract: A Novel Classification System of Renal Hilar Tumors for Surgical Guidance: Technique, Outcome, and Safety

Bo-Han Lin,Shao-Hao Chen,Zhong-Tian Ruan,Rui-Cheng Gao,Qian-Ren-Shun Qiu,Ye-Hui Chen,Qing-Shui Zheng,Yong Wei,Xue-Yi Xue,Ning Xu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-024-15588-z
IF: 4.339
2024-01-01
Annals of Surgical Oncology
Abstract:This study was designed to develop an innovative classification and guidance system for renal hilar tumors and to assess the safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) for managing such tumors. A total of 179 patients undergoing RAPN for renal hilar tumors were retrospectively reviewed. A novel classification system with surgical techniques was introduced and the perioperative features, tumor characteristics, and the efficacy and safety of RAPN were compared within subgroups. We classified the tumors according to our novel system as follows: 131 Type I, 35 Type II, and 13 Type III. However, Type III had higher median R.E.N.A.L., PADUA, and ROADS scores compared with the others (all p < 0.001), indicating increased operative complexity and higher estimated blood loss [180.00 (115.00–215.00) ml]. Operative outcomes revealed significant disparities between Type III and the others, with longer operative times [165.00 (145.00–200.50) min], warm ischemia times [24.00 (21.50–30.50) min], tumor resection times [13.00 (12.00–15.50) min], and incision closure times [22.00 (20.00–23.50) min] (all p < 0.005). Postoperative outcomes also showed significant differences, with longer durations of drain removal (77.08 ± 18.16 h) and hospitalization for Type III [5.00 (5.00–6.00) d] (all p < 0.05). Additionally, Type I had a larger tumor diameter than the others (p = 0.009) and pT stage differed significantly between the subtypes (p = 0.020). The novel renal hilar tumor classification system is capable of differentiating the surgical difficulty of RAPN and further offers personalized surgical steps tailored to each specific classification. It provides a meaningful tool for clinical practice.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?