Abstract:Objective To compare the perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) with transperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN).Methods From July 2009 to March 2013,114 patients were treated in our hospital due to renal carcinoma,including RAPN in 45 patients and LPN in 69 patients.Their data were retrospectively reviewed.Clinical and pathological variables,R.E.N.A.L nephrometry score,operation time (OT),warm ischemia time (WIT),estimated blood loss (EBL),drainage volume,the length of hospitalization,estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) outcomes,and complications were analyzed.Results There were no significant differences between the RAPN and LPN group with respect to patient age,sex,tumor laterality,size,R.E.N.A.L nephrometry score,the rate of hilar tumor and preoperative eGFR (P＞0.05).The median OT was shorter in the RAPN group than that in LPN group (165 min vs.196 min,P＜0.05).The median WIT was shorter in the RAPN than that in LPN group (21 min vs.25 min,P＜0.05).However,there were no significant differences in the postoperative eGFR and changing of eGFR within the 2 groups (P＞0.05).The rate of transfusion was similar between the RAPN (2/45) and LPN (4/69) group (P=0.72).There was also no significant difference in EBL (P=0.16).The drainage volume was also similar within two groups (167 ml vs.163 ml,P=0.81).The length of hospitalization was more favorable in the RAPN group (6.5 d vs.8.0 d,P=0.01).In RAPN group,27 cases were clear-cell carcinoma,5 cases were papillary cell carcinoma,2 cases were chromophobe cell carcinoma and 1 1 cases were angioleiomyolipoma.In LPN group,45 cases were clear-cell carcinoma,9 cases were papillary cell carcinoma,3 cases were chromophobe cell carcinoma and 12 cases were angioleiomyolipoma.There was no difference of pathological types between LPN and RAPN groups (P＞0.05).The rate of positive surgical margins was 0％ (0/45) in RAPN group and 1.4％ (1/69) in LPN group (P=0.69).The rates of complication requiring intervention (Clavien grade Ⅲ) were 2.2％ (1/45) and 2.9％ (2/69) in the RAPN and LPN group,respectively (P＞0.05).Median follow up was 12 (4-36) months in the RAPN and 13 (5-34) months in the LPN group.No local recurrence or metastasis occurred in two groups.Conclusions Early comparative outcomes suggest that RAPN has a significant benefit over the LPN in terms of OT,WIT and hospital stay.Meanwhile,it offers equivalent prognosis and postoperative renal function preservation compared with LPN.\r\n\r\nKey words: \r\nKidney neoplasms; Partial nephrectomy; Laparoscopes; Robot-assisted

The perioperative outcomes between renal hilar and non-hilar tumors following robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN)

[Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy for Treating Renal Hilar Tumors: a Clinical Study of 22 Cases].

A multi-institutional analysis of 263 hilar tumors during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy

Perioperative, oncologic, and functional outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for special types of renal tumors (hilar, endophytic, or cystic): an evidence-based analysis of comparative outcomes

Comparison of perioperative outcomes in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy

Application of selective clamping of renal arterial branches in robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal hilar tumors

Perioperative, Functional, and Oncologic Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Versus Open Partial Nephrectomy for Complex Renal Tumors (RENAL Score ≥ 7): an Evidence-Based Analysis

Robotic Partial Nephrectomy: Current Technique and Outcomes

Outcomes and Techniques of Robotic-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy (RAPN) for Renal Hilar Masses: A Comprehensive Systematic Review

Meta-analysis of clinical outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy and classical open partial nephrectomy

Three-dimensional laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal hilar tumors: an empirical analysis of 290 patients

ASO Visual Abstract: A Novel Classification System of Renal Hilar Tumors for Surgical Guidance: Technique, Outcome, and Safety

Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Tumor Enucleation is a Feasible Technique for Renal Hilar Tumors: A Retrospective Study

Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes of Robotic Vs. Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy for Renal Tumors with a RENAL Nephrometry Score ≥7: A Meta-Analysis

Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy Versus Radical Nephrectomy for Clinical T1 Renal Hilar Tumor: Comparison of Perioperative Characteristics and Short-Term Functional and Oncologic Outcomes

Comparison of robot-assisted and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for complex renal tumours with a RENAL nephrometry score ≥7: peri-operative and oncological outcomes.

Perioperative and Long-Term Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy: A Systematic Review

Off-clamp robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for purely hilar tumors: Technique, perioperative, oncologic and functional outcomes from a single center series

Retroperitoneal robotic versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumors: a matched comparison of perioperative outcomes of a single surgeon

Short-term results of robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (Report of 22 cases)