Abstract:China is currently pursuing a new round of electricity reform, aiming to establish cost-bidding wholesale elec-tricity markets to replace the current centrally planned electricity economy. Cost minimization-oriented mar-ketization can reshape generation priorities from an economic and low-carbon perspective. However, while the existing literature mainly focuses on the operation, emission, and curtailment evaluation of renewables after electricity market reform, few studies have well addressed the impact of the reform on long-term generation portfolios. Here, we analyze the impacts of China's electricity reform on generation portfolios based on a refined model describing China's electricity system operation and planning modes before and after marketization, i.e., centrally planned-electricity operation (CPO) and a competitive wholesale-electricity market (CWM), respec-tively. By comparing the generation portfolios of six provinces in 2020 and 2030, we conclude that China's marketization could significantly reduce the proportion of thermal generation by 0.81%-27.48%, of which the market share of low-capacity but coal-heavy generators (<300 MW) could potentially drop by more than 50%. The provincial diversity highly depends on the existing power resource configuration, e.g., the penetration level of renewables and the proportion of thermal generation. In addition, we discover that marketization has a limited impact on renewable expansion planning. In contrast to CPO, CWM can slightly increase the investment in wind and solar energy by less than 1% owing to a relatively high levelized cost of energy (LCOE) of wind and solar energy. Therefore, we further conduct a sensitivity analysis of the renewable LCOE, and it indicates that a reduction in wind investment costs to 2500-5000 CNY/kW (LCOE reaching 0.102-0.204 CNY/kWh) and solar investment costs to 2000-6000 CNY/kW (LCOE reaching 0.107-0.320 CNY/kWh) can effectively promote renewable portfolios.

Tensions between local interests and broader gains

Evaluating the impacts of reforming and integrating China's electricity sector

Power market reform in China: Motivations, progress, and recommendations

Avoiding Pitfalls in China’s Electricity Sector Reforms

Assessing the roles of efficient market versus regulatory capture in China's power market reform

Efficiency vs. equity as China's national carbon market meets provincial electricity markets

Assessing the impact of regulatory reforms on China's electricity generation industry

Carbon pricing and electricity market reforms in China

Interactions Between Market Reform and a Carbon Price in China’s Power Sector

Revealing the political decision toward Chinese carbon abatement: Based on equity and efficiency criteria

Low Carbon and Efficiency Oriented Day-Ahead Joint Electrical Energy and Ancillary Services Market Clearing Model for Generation-Side in China

Analysis of Electricity Market Deregulation Effect on Chinese Economic Development Towards Carbon Neutrality: A Socioeconomic Perspective

Research on Provincial Regulation Ancillary Service Market of China under the New Round of Electricity Reform

Research on China’s New Energy Cross-Provincial Marketization Mechanism under the Background of “double Carbon”

Have renewables and market-oriented reforms constrained the technical efficiency improvement of China's electric grid utilities?

Transition from plan to market: Imperfect regulations in the electricity sector of China

Sustainable and market-oriented solutions for the electricity sales market reform

Implications of Power Industry Marketization for Sustainable Generation Portfolios in China

Energy, economic, and environmental impacts of electricity market-oriented reform and the carbon emissions trading: A recursive dynamic CGE model in China

A Comparative Analysis of Separate and Joint Environmental Rights Trading Markets in China

Preventing Tacit Collusion in Chinese Electricity Reform