Abstract:Background To evaluate the validity and reliability of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) masseter muscle segmentation by comparing with the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) masseter muscle segmentation of the same patients. Methods Seventeen volunteers were included in this study. CBCT and MRI scans of the volunteers were taken, respectively, within one month. The masseter muscles in the CBCT scans were segmented by a generative adversarial network (GAN)-based framework combined with manual check. The masseter muscles in the MRI scans were segmented manually. The segmentations were repeated by the first examiner and a second examiner. For cross-sectional area (CSA), paired t-test, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and standard error of measurement (SEM) were calculated to evaluate the validity and reliability of the segmentations. The validity and reliability were also calculated by Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and average Hausdorff distance (aHD) between different segmentations. Seventeen volunteers were included in this study. CBCT and MRI scans of the volunteers were taken, respectively, within one month. The masseter muscles in the CBCT scans were segmented by a generative adversarial network (GAN)-based framework combined with manual check. The masseter muscles in the MRI scans were segmented manually. The segmentations were repeated by the first examiner and a second examiner. For cross-sectional area (CSA), paired t-test, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and standard error of measurement (SEM) were calculated to evaluate the validity and reliability of the segmentations. The validity and reliability were also calculated by Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and average Hausdorff distance (aHD) between different segmentations. Results Paired t-test showed that there was no significant difference in CSA between CBCT and MRI masseter segmentations. The ICCs were all larger than 0.95 and the SEM was less than 4.85 mm 2 for CSA. The DSC was all larger than 0.95 showing over 95% of similarity between CBCT and MRI masseter segmentations. The aHD was all smaller than 0.09 mm showing great consistency of the contour of CBCT and MRI segmentations. Conclusion Masseter muscle segmentation from CBCT scans was not significantly different from the segmentation from MRI scans. CBCT muscle segmentation showed great validity compared with MRI scans, and great reliability in retests.

Measurement Plane of the Cross-Sectional Area of the Masseter Muscle in Patients with Skeletal Class III Malocclusion: an Artificial Intelligence Model

Changes in masseter muscle morphology after surgical-orthodontic treatment in patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion with mandibular asymmetry: The automatic masseter muscle segmentation model

Cone-beam Computed Tomography-based Three-Dimensional Cephalometric Analysis of Mandible Symmetry and the Occlusal Plane of Adult Patients with High-Angle Skeletal Class III Malocclusion and Jaw Deformity

Inclination of mandibular incisors and symphysis in severe skeletal class III malocclusion

A Modified Protocol to Evaluate Masseter Morphology Based on Automatic Segmentation and Registration

Machine Learning Algorithms for the Diagnosis of Class III Malocclusions in Children

Assessment of Masseter Volume and Postoperative Stability After Orthognathic Surgery in Patients With Skeletal Class III Malocclusion With Facial Asymmetry

Automated Assessment of Mandibular Shape Asymmetry in 3-Dimensions

Assessing masseter muscle volume and activity in relation to craniofacial morphology: a 3D CBCT study

Lower Central Incisors Location of Severe Skeletal Class Ⅲ Malocclusion

A mathematical algorithm of the facial symmetry plane: Application to mandibular deformity 3D facial data

Validity and Reliability of Masseter Muscles Segmentation from the Transverse Sections of Cone-Beam CT Scans Compared with MRI Scans

Quantitative assessment of masticatory muscles based on skull muscle attachment areas in Carnivora

Study of Cranioficial Structure by Anteroposterior Cephalometric Analysis in Skeletal Class Ⅲ Patients

Anterior cerebral falx plane in MR images to estimate the craniofacial midline

Automatic Landmark Annotation and Measurement of 3D Mandibular Morphology Using Non-Rigid Registration: A Preliminary Exploration and Accuracy Assessment

Cephalometric analysis of chin soft tissue on Angle Class Ⅱ1 malocclusion with different vertical skeletal craniofacial patterns

Classification and characterization of facial asymmetry in adult patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion using cluster analysis

Using the Anterior Cranial Base to Provide a Reliable Reference Plane for Patients with or Without Facial Asymmetry.

Assessment of hard and soft tissue thickness at mandibular symphysis in skeletal Class III patients with different vertical patterns

Study of the relationship between the long axis of the mandibular symphysis and the lower incisors in natural dentition based on cephalometric analysis