The safety and efficacy of balanced crystalloid vs. normal saline in non-cardiac surgeries - A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Q Cao,Q-Y Pang,S-F Sun,Y Jiang,H-L Liu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26355/eurrev_202405_36180

2024-01-01

European review for medical and pharmacological sciences

Abstract:OBJECTIVE:Balanced crystalloid and normal saline are routinely used in clinical anesthesia, but their safety and efficacy in non-cardiac surgeries are still unclear. MATERIALS AND METHODS:PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Wanfang, and CNKI, from January 1980 to March 2023, were searched. Studies comparing balanced crystalloid (BC) with normal saline (NS) during non-cardiac surgeries were included. The primary outcomes were clinical outcomes (acidosis, renal insufficiency, and mortality), and the secondary outcomes were pH value, Na+, Cl- and creatinine levels, and vasopressor requirement. RESULTS:Forty-three RCTs were included in this meta-analysis. Low evidence revealed that the development of acidosis was lower in the BC group than in the NS group (OR: 0.05, 95% CI: 0.01-0.43, I2=80.8%, p=0.00), and no between-group difference exists in renal insufficiency and mortality. At the end of surgery and on postoperative day 1 (POD 1), the pH value was higher, and the levels of Na+ and Cl- were lower in the BC group. No between-group difference exists in creatinine level and vasopressor requirement. CONCLUSIONS:Perioperative balanced crystalloids can maintain the stability of acid-base and electrolyte balance and reduce acidosis compared with saline, but they cannot reduce postoperative renal insufficiency and mortality.