IN-HOSPITAL MORTALITY AFTER KNEE REPLACEMENT IN CHINA: ANALYSIS OF A LARGE NATIONAL DATABASE
C. Zeng,M. Englund,J. Wei,H. Long,D. Xie,Z. Zhou,Y. Shi,X. He,H. Chen,H. Wang,Y. Zhang,G. Lei
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2019.02.587
IF: 7.507
2019-01-01
Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
Abstract:Purpose: In-hospital mortality and its risk factors after knee replacement has been studied in industrialized countries. However, such data are lacking in China where technology of knee replacement has become more accessible. Also, there is a rapid increasing demand for knee replacement owing to the ageing and increasingly obese population and the resulting increased prevalence of knee osteoarthritis. Thus, for the first time, we aimed to describe trends of in-hospital mortality after knee replacement in China and examine its risk factors. Methods: Patients underwent primary knee replacement were identified using procedure codes according to the International Classification of Diseases-10th Revision (ICD-10) (81.54) in the Hospital Quality Monitoring System (HQMS) in China from 2013 to 2016. HQMS contained 124.4 million inpatient data from 982 Class-3 hospitals (which are similar with tertiary hospitals but also provide primary and secondary care to the nationwide patient population) across all 31 provincial-level administrative regions in mainland China, which consisted of 44.0% of in-patients admitted to all Class-3 hospitals (2013-2016). Our outcome was in-hospital mortality within 30 days after total or partial primary knee replacement, hereafter referred to as in-hospital mortality. We examined the relation of each risk factor (age [< 60, 60-69, 70-79, ≥ 80 years], sex [male, female], marital status [married, single], geographical location [Beijing, East, South-Central, South-West, North-East, North-West, North], Charlson comorbidity index [CCI; 0, ≥ 1], or hospital volume of knee replacement [< 200/year, 200-400/year, > 400/year]) to the in-hospital mortality using Poisson regression model. Results: Over a four-year period, the final sample in the current analysis consisted of 113,078 knee replacements, and the absolute number increased by 67.8% from 20,316 in 2013 to 34,100 in 2016 (Table 1). Of the total 113,078 knee replacements, 39 deaths (0.34‰) occurred within 30 days before discharge. Compared with their counterparts, old age, male sex, and having Charlson comorbidity index ≥ 1 had a higher in-hospital mortality (all P < 0.05) (Table 2). Single marital status was associated with higher, albeit non-statistically significant, in-hospital mortality than married patients (Relative Risk [RR], 1.6; 95% CI: 0.6-4.6). In-hospital mortality varied by geographic regions (P = 0.05), with the lowest mortality in East region (0.16‰), followed by Beijing (0.27‰), South-Central (0.30‰), South-West (0.46‰), North-East (0.67‰), North-West (0.69‰), and North regions (0.81‰) (Figure 1). RRs for in-hospital mortality were 0.8 (95% CI: 0.4-1.6) and 0.4 (95% CI: 0.1-0.9) in hospitals with knee replacement volume = 200-400/year and > 400/year compared with < 200/year, respectively (P for trend = 0.04) (Table 2). Conclusions: While there is a rapid increase in number of knee replacements performed in China over past four-year and in-hospital mortality after knee replacement appears low, discrepancies in in-hospital mortality after knee replacement exist according to socio-demographic factors. Health care sources should be allocated more to underdeveloped regions to further reduce in-hospital mortality in China.Table 1Characteristics of knee replacements in Hospital Quality Monitoring System.Characteristics2013201420152016TotalNumber of procedures20,31627,80130,86134,100113,078Age, mean (SD, year)64.9 (10.7)65.3 (10.1)65.8 (9.8)66.0 (9.8)65.6 (10.0)Age (%), year< 6023.722.119.718.520.760-6941.442.943.944.843.570-7931.531.132.132.331.8≥ 803.43.84.34.44.1Sex (%)Male21.821.822.022.422.0Female78.278.278.077.678.0Marital status (%)Married91.291.591.290.691.1Single5.85.75.66.35.9Geographical location of hospitals (%)Beijing25.815.813.613.216.2East32.836.539.140.237.7South-Central15.118.619.317.217.7South-West6.78.17.58.17.7North-East4.86.05.54.85.3North-West8.27.37.87.87.7North6.67.77.28.77.7Indication of knee replacement (%)Osteoarthritis89.289.789.490.489.7Non-osteoarthritis10.810.310.69.810.3Charlson Comorbidity Index (%)082.282.180.479.380.8≥ 117.817.919.620.719.2Hospital volume of knee replacement (%)< 200/year39.851.250.848.548.2200-400/year20.119.319.821.420.2> 400/year40.129.529.430.231.6 Open table in a new tab Table 2Risk factors for in-hospital mortality within 30 days after knee replacement.ExposuresNo. knee replacementNo. deathMortality(1/1000)Age and sex-adjusted RR (95% CI)Multivariable-adjusted RR (95% CI)Age, year< 6023,37240.171.0 (Reference)-60-6949,157110.221.3 (0.4, 4.2)-70-7935,963180.502.9 (1.0, 8.5)-≥ 804,58661.317.0 (2.0, 25.0)-P for trend---0.001-SexFemale88,162240.271.0 (Reference)-Male24,916150.602.0 (1.1, 3.9)-Marital statusMarried103,016320.311.0 (Reference)1.0 (Reference)Single6,65540.602.1 (0.8, 6.1)2.1 (0.8, 6.1)Geographic locationBeijing18,32050.271.0 (Reference)1.0 (Reference)East42,59170.160.6 (0.2, 1.8)0.4 (0.1, 1.4)South-Central20,05860.301.1 (0.3, 3.6)0.6 (0.2, 2.3)South-West8,66140.461.8 (0.5, 6.6)1.1 (0.3, 4.5)North-East6,01140.672.7 (0.7, 10.2)1.5 (0.4, 6.3)North-West8,74560.692.6 (0.8, 8.5)1.7 (0.5, 5.8)North8,69270.813.2 (1.0, 10.0)1.9 (0.6, 6.8)Overall χ2 test---0.0160.050Charlson Comorbidity Index091,399230.251.0 (Reference)1.0 (Reference)≥ 121,679160.742.5 (1.3, 4.7)2.3 (1.2, 4.5)P for trend---0.0140.038Hospital volume of knee replacement< 200/year54,518260.481.0 (Reference)1.0 (Reference)200-400/year22,84780.350.7 (0.3, 1.6)0.8 (0.4, 1.7)> 400/year35,71350.140.3 (0.1, 0.8)0.4 (0.1, 0.9)P for trend---0.0140.038 Open table in a new tab