The necessity of revisions for failed primary total knee arthroplasty

林剑浩,吕厚山,寇伯龙,袁燕林,钟群杰

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2010.04.005

2010-01-01

Abstract:Objective To discuss why primary total knee arthroplasties (PTKA) are revised in order that the rate of revision total knee arthroplasties (RTKA) could be lowered and the survivorship of knee protheses could be improved.Methods According to the definiton of revision total knee arthroplasties,the data about RTKA which were done in Peking university people's hostpital between June 1990 and June 2009 were analysed retrospectively.In light of the year when the RTKA were done,the patients were divided into group A (from June 1990 to June 1999) and group B (from July 1999 to June 2009).Meanwhile,in the light of the time interval between PTKA and RTKA,the patients were also divided into early revision group and late revision group.Statistical software SPSS 12.0 was utilized so as to analyse the data about the time interval between group A and group B by t test,and to analyse the data about the etiology of PTKA by chi-square test.Results 95.4% (83/87) of the patients had more than two reasons for RTKA.Group A:the time interval between PTKA and RTKA was (37.03±36.19) months;main reasons for RTKA were sepsis (46.7%),aspetic loosening (46.7%),malalignment (40.0%) and so on;Group B:the time interval between PTKA and RTKA was (44.53±56.32) months;main reasons for RTKA were sepsis (66.7%),aseptic loosening (23.6%),malalignment (19.4%) and so on.No statistical significance existed in the time interval and the reasons for RTKA between the two groups.Early revison group:the time interval between PTKA and RTKA was (11.71±5.48) months,main reasons for RTKA were sepsis (69.6%),malalignment (19.6%),aseptic loosening (15.2%) and so on.Late revision group:the time interval between PTKA and RTKA was (78.6±60.38) months,main reasons for RTKA were sepsis (56.1%),aspetic loosening (41.5%),osteolysis (29.3%) and so on.Statistical significance only existed in "aseptic loosening" between the two groups (P=0.006).Conclusions The etiologies of RTKA are interrelated.Although there is no statistical significance existing in group A and group B,it is still believed that the etiologies of RTKA vary with the development of knee protheses.Whether in early revision group or in late revision group,the most noteworthy etiology for RTKA is sepsis.Great emphasis should continue to be put into the problem.Compared with the data from the foreign literatures,the current one should continue to be accumlated and improved.