Abstract:Hydraulic fracturing is a widely used technique applied in unconventional reservoirs to generate large fracture networks. Interactions between hydraulic fracture (HF) and natural fracture (NF) can impact the fracture topology and thus the subsequent productivity. Despite a large number of studies on HF–NF interactions, the HF propagation path is normally judged based on ad-hoc criteria to decide whether crossing or deflection occurs and the mechanism behind has not yet reached a unified understanding. Here, we use a phase-field model (PFM), which is based on a unified fracture propagation criterion, to investigate the influence of in-situ stress, fracturing operational parameters and NF orientation and strength. We analyze the mechanism behind different propagation patterns resulting from different kinds of NFs—non-cemented and cemented ones under different conditions. In particular, we compare the total energies between the symmetric propagation and asymmetric propagation to verify the minimum energy propagation path. Our results indicate that a higher stress anisotropy more likely leads to HF–NF crossing and a less fracture complexity. Injection rate influences propagation speed and fracture complexity. Within a certain range (30°, 45°, 60° in this study), the larger the approaching angle is, the more complex the fractures become. With the increasing strength contrast between NF and rock matrix, the material heterogeneity increases, encouraging HF to form complex fractures. Opening more strongly cemented NFs, which act as a barrier for propagation, consumes more energy than HF propagation outside the interface. Lower stress anisotropy and higher injection rate lead to higher initiation pressure, requiring more energy for propagation.

A Phase-Field Model for Simulating the Propagation Behavior of Mixed-Mode Cracks During the Hydraulic Fracturing Process in Fractured Reservoirs

Phase field model for simulating hydraulic fracture propagation and oil–water two-phase flow in reservoir

Phase Field Modeling of Hydraulic Fracturing in Porous Media Formation with Natural Fracture

Hydraulic Fracturing Phase-Field Model in Porous Viscoelastic Media

Phase Field Model for Hydraulic Fracture Propagation in Porous Medium and Numerical Simulation Analysis of Hydraulic Fracture Propagation in A Layered Reservoir

Phase-field Model of Hydraulic Fracturing in Thermoelastic-Plastic Media

A Consistent Phase Field Model for Hydraulic Fracture Propagation in Poroelastic Media

A phase-field model for hydraulic fracture nucleation and propagation in porous media

A hydro-mechanical-damage fully coupled cohesive phase field model for complicated fracking simulations in poroelastic media

An Investigation of Hydraulic Fracture Propagation in Multi-Layered Formation Via the Phase Field Method

A hybrid phase-field method for modeling mixed-mode fractures in elastoplastic rock-like materials

Novel Phase FIeld Model of Hydraulic Fracture Propagation in Poroelastic Media and Numerical Investigation of Interaction Between Hydraulic Fracture and Natural Fracture

On the hydraulic fracturing in naturally-layered porous media using the phase field method

Coupled Thermo-Hydro-mechanical-phase Field Modelling for Hydraulic Fracturing in Thermo-Poroelastic Media

Phase Field Modeling of Hydraulic Fracturing with Interfacial Damage in Highly Heterogeneous Fluid-Saturated Porous Media

Fluid-solid-phase multi-field coupling modeling method for hydraulic fracture of saturated brittle porous materials

Phase-Field Modeling of a Single Horizontal Fluid-Driven Fracture Propagation in Spatially Variable Rock Mass

A Phase Field Framework to Model Acid Fracture Propagation with Hydro-Mechano-reactive Flow Coupling

Phase Field Modelling of Interactions Between Hydraulic Fractures and Natural Fractures

A phase-field modeling approach of fracture propagation in poroelastic media

A phase-field description of dynamic hydraulic fracturing