Abstract:Differential privacy (DP), as a rigorous mathematical definition quantifying privacy leakage, has become a well-accepted standard for privacy protection. Combined with powerful machine learning (ML) techniques, differentially private machine learning (DPML) is increasingly important. As the most classic DPML algorithm, DP-SGD incurs a significant loss of utility, which hinders DPML's deployment in practice. Many studies have recently proposed improved algorithms based on DP-SGD to mitigate utility loss. However, these studies are isolated and cannot comprehensively measure the performance of improvements proposed in algorithms. More importantly, there is a lack of comprehensive research to compare improvements in these DPML algorithms across utility, defensive capabilities, and generalizability. We fill this gap by performing a holistic measurement of improved DPML algorithms on utility and defense capability against membership inference attacks (MIAs) on image classification tasks. We first present a taxonomy of where improvements are located in the ML life cycle. Based on our taxonomy, we jointly perform an extensive measurement study of the improved DPML algorithms, over twelve algorithms, four model architectures, four datasets, two attacks, and various privacy budget configurations. We also cover state-of-the-art label differential privacy (Label DP) algorithms in the evaluation. According to our empirical results, DP can effectively defend against MIAs, and sensitivity-bounding techniques such as per-sample gradient clipping play an important role in defense. We also explore some improvements that can maintain model utility and defend against MIAs more effectively. Experiments show that Label DP algorithms achieve less utility loss but are fragile to MIAs. ML practitioners may benefit from these evaluations to select appropriate algorithms. To support our evaluation, we implement a modular re-usable software, DPMLBench,(1) which enables sensitive data owners to deploy DPML algorithms and serves as a benchmark tool for researchers and practitioners.

PV-PATE: an Improved PATE for Deep Learning with Differential Privacy in Trusted Industrial Data Matrix

DPHMM: Customizable Data Release with Differential Privacy Via Hidden Markov Model.

Privacy‐enhancing machine learning framework with private aggregation of teacher ensembles

PKDGAN: Private Knowledge Distillation with Generative Adversarial Networks

Private Knowledge Transfer via Model Distillation with Generative Adversarial Networks

Enhance PATE on Complex Tasks with Knowledge Transferred from Non-Private Data

Hot PATE: Private Aggregation of Distributions for Diverse Task

Scalable Private Learning with PATE

Privacy-Preserving Classification on Deep Learning with Exponential Mechanism

DPMLBench: Holistic Evaluation of Differentially Private Machine Learning

Decentralized Differentially Private Segmentation with PATE

Does Differential Privacy Prevent Backdoor Attacks in Practice?

SEDML: Securely and efficiently harnessing distributed knowledge in machine learning

Private-kNN: Practical Differential Privacy for Computer Vision

A PATE-based Approach for Training Graph Neural Networks under Label Differential Privacy

Private, Efficient, and Accurate: Protecting Models Trained by Multi-party Learning with Differential Privacy

On the Fairness Impacts of Private Ensembles Models

In Differential Privacy, There is Truth: On Vote Leakage in Ensemble Private Learning

Quantum Privacy Aggregation of Teacher Ensembles (QPATE) for Privacy-preserving Quantum Machine Learning

Semi-supervised Knowledge Transfer for Deep Learning from Private Training Data

3LegRace: Privacy-Preserving DNN Training over TEEs and GPUs