Abstract:The Private Aggregation of Teacher Ensembles (PATE) framework is a versatile approach to privacy-preserving machine learning. In PATE, teacher models that are not privacy-preserving are trained on distinct portions of sensitive data. Privacy-preserving knowledge transfer to a student model is then facilitated by privately aggregating teachers' predictions on new examples. Employing PATE with generative auto-regressive models presents both challenges and opportunities. These models excel in open ended \emph{diverse} (aka hot) tasks with multiple valid responses. Moreover, the knowledge of models is often encapsulated in the response distribution itself and preserving this diversity is critical for fluid and effective knowledge transfer from teachers to student. In all prior designs, higher diversity resulted in lower teacher agreement and thus -- a tradeoff between diversity and privacy. Prior works with PATE thus focused on non-diverse settings or limiting diversity to improve utility.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is how to effectively handle diverse and open - ended tasks in the privacy - protected machine - learning framework. Specifically, the author focuses on how to design a method under the Private Aggregation of Teacher Ensembles (PATE) framework that can both maintain the diversity of the generative model (i.e., multiple valid responses) and ensure privacy protection. ### Problem Background 1. **PATE Framework**: - PATE is a machine - learning method for privacy protection. It trains multiple teacher models to perform partitioned training on sensitive data and then trains a student model by aggregating the prediction results of these teacher models. This process ensures that even if the student model is privacy - protected, the teacher models do not need to have privacy - protection features. 2. **Trade - off between Diversity and Privacy**: - In the traditional PATE framework, when the task is highly diverse (i.e., there are multiple valid responses), the agreement between teacher models will decrease, resulting in an increase in privacy - protecting noise. This makes the traditional PATE less effective in highly diverse tasks. 3. **Requirements for Generative Models**: - Generative models (such as large - language models) perform well in handling open - ended tasks because they can generate multiple valid responses. However, this diversity is difficult to preserve in the traditional PATE framework, limiting the capabilities of generative models. ### Core Problems of the Paper The paper proposes and solves the following core problems: - **How to design a PATE framework suitable for diverse and open - ended tasks?** - The author proposes the "hot PATE" framework, which is specifically optimized for diverse and open - ended tasks. In this framework, each teacher model generates a response distribution instead of a single label. These distributions are combined through a new aggregation method to ensure that both diversity is preserved and privacy is not lost. - **How to ensure privacy protection while preserving diversity?** - The author introduces a new aggregation method called "coordinated ensembles". This method, by sharing randomness, enables the responses of different teacher models to be highly consistent in some cases, thus avoiding the increase in privacy noise caused by increased diversity. ### Solutions 1. **hot PATE Framework**: - Each teacher model generates a response distribution instead of a single label. - Use the coordinated ensembles method for aggregation to ensure that the diversity of the response distribution is preserved. 2. **Coordinated Ensembles**: - Teacher models share the same random seed, so that their responses can be highly consistent in some cases. - This consistency allows for effective privacy protection even in cases of high diversity. 3. **Definition of Diversity Preservation**: - The author formally defines the concept of diversity preservation and designs an aggregation method that meets this requirement. - Specifically, if a certain response has a certain probability in a sufficient number of teacher models, then this response should also have a corresponding probability in the aggregated distribution. ### Experimental Verification The paper experimentally verifies the effectiveness of hot PATE, especially in the context - learning tasks, demonstrating its advantages in preserving diversity and improving privacy protection. ### Summary The main contribution of this paper is the proposal of a new PATE framework - hot PATE, which is specifically optimized for diverse and open - ended tasks. By introducing coordinated ensembles and a formal definition of diversity preservation, hot PATE can preserve the diversity of generative models while ensuring privacy protection, thus releasing the potential of generative models in more application scenarios.

Hot PATE: Private Aggregation of Distributions for Diverse Task

Scalable Private Learning with PATE

On the Fairness Impacts of Private Ensembles Models

Enhance PATE on Complex Tasks with Knowledge Transferred from Non-Private Data

Privacy‐enhancing machine learning framework with private aggregation of teacher ensembles

Private Knowledge Transfer via Model Distillation with Generative Adversarial Networks

PKDGAN: Private Knowledge Distillation with Generative Adversarial Networks

Decentralized Differentially Private Segmentation with PATE

Revisiting Model-Agnostic Private Learning: Faster Rates and Active Learning

Semi-supervised Knowledge Transfer for Deep Learning from Private Training Data

Privacy-Preserving Classification on Deep Learning with Exponential Mechanism

Quantum Privacy Aggregation of Teacher Ensembles (QPATE) for Privacy-preserving Quantum Machine Learning

In Differential Privacy, There is Truth: On Vote Leakage in Ensemble Private Learning

Generalized PTR: User-Friendly Recipes for Data-Adaptive Algorithms with Differential Privacy

A PATE-based Approach for Training Graph Neural Networks under Label Differential Privacy

SEDML: Securely and efficiently harnessing distributed knowledge in machine learning

Private-kNN: Practical Differential Privacy for Computer Vision

PATE-TripleGAN: Privacy-Preserving Image Synthesis with Gaussian Differential Privacy

P4: Towards private, personalized, and Peer-to-Peer learning

DP-SGD vs PATE: Which Has Less Disparate Impact on GANs?

Dynamic Private Task Assignment under Differential Privacy