Abstract:Convergent data indicate that certain substances that interact with N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors or metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) do not affect acquisition processes per se, or retrieval, but interfere specifically with the formation of memory traces. This action differs widely in its amplitude and time-course according to the learning task used. We showed that systemic injection of the competitive NMDA receptor antagonists, gamma-L-glutamyl-L-aspartate (gamma-LGLA) and 3-(2-carboxypiperazin-4-yl)propyl-1-phosphonate (CPP), or intracerebroventricular infusion of D-2-amino-5-phosphonovalerate (D-AP5), immediately following acquisition of a Y-maze avoidance learning task in mice, deeply impaired retention of the temporal component of the task (leaving the start alley within the first 5 s of a trial), which significantly improved in controls during the hours following acquisition. In contrast the same substances had no or only slight effects on retention of the discrimination component (choice of the correct alley), which did not improve over time in control animals. This retention deficit did not appear to be due to an action on acquisition, retrieval and/or forgetting processes, or to state-dependent effects. Moreover, gamma-LGLA, CPP or AP5, when administered immediately after partial acquisition of a food-reinforced bar-press task, suppressed the spontaneous improvement in post-training performance observed in control mice 24 h after the training session. (R,S)-alpha-methyl-4-carboxyphenylglycine (MCPG), an antagonist of mGluRs, also suppressed the post-training performance increment and its effects were antagonized by the co-administration of trans-ACPD, an agonist of mGluRs. Post-training improvement of performance over time is thought to reflect an active and dynamic process, leading to the organization of memory traces. According to this hypothesis, our results suggest that synaptic plasticity mediated by NMDA receptors and/or mGluRs activation is involved in mechanisms underlying long-term consolidation of memory traces.

Activation of Gs Signaling in Cortical Astrocytes Does Not Influence Formation of a Persistent Contextual Memory Engram

Astrocytes Gate Long-Term Potentiation in Hippocampal Interneurons

Calmodulin Shuttling Mediates Cytonuclear Signaling to Trigger Experience-Dependent Transcription and Memory

Chronic activation of astrocytic G GPCR signaling has causal effects on visual LTP formation: implications for neurodegenerative diseases

Learning-associated astrocyte ensembles regulate memory recall

Noradrenergic Signaling Mediates Cortical Early Tagging and Storage of Remote Memory

Astrocytes control recent and remote memory strength by affecting the recruitment of the CA1→ACC projection to engrams

Astrocytic determinant of the fate of long‐term memory

Mapping Neuronal Activation and the Influence of Adrenergic Signaling During Contextual Memory Retrieval.

GABAB receptors mediate intracellular calcium release in astrocytes of the prefrontal cortex

Unsilenced inhibitory cortical ensemble gates remote memory retrieval

Fear learning induces α7-nicotinic acetylcholine receptor-mediated astrocytic responsiveness that is required for memory persistence

Activation of astrocytes in hippocampus decreases fear memory through adenosine A1 receptors

Chemogenetic Activation of Astrocytes in the Basolateral Amygdala Contributes to Fear Memory Formation by Modulating the Amygdala–Prefrontal Cortex Communication

Upregulation of astroglial connexin 30 impairs hippocampal synaptic activity and recognition memory

Reactivation of encoding ensembles in the prelimbic cortex supports temporal associations

Are glutamate receptors specifically implicated in some forms of memory processes?

Control of contextual memory through interneuronal α5-GABAA receptors

Contributions of Glucocorticoid Receptors in Cortical Astrocytes to Memory Recall

Deciphering the astrocytic contribution to learning and relearning