Are glutamate receptors specifically implicated in some forms of memory processes?

A Ungerer,C Mathis,C Mélan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002210050543
Abstract:Convergent data indicate that certain substances that interact with N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors or metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) do not affect acquisition processes per se, or retrieval, but interfere specifically with the formation of memory traces. This action differs widely in its amplitude and time-course according to the learning task used. We showed that systemic injection of the competitive NMDA receptor antagonists, gamma-L-glutamyl-L-aspartate (gamma-LGLA) and 3-(2-carboxypiperazin-4-yl)propyl-1-phosphonate (CPP), or intracerebroventricular infusion of D-2-amino-5-phosphonovalerate (D-AP5), immediately following acquisition of a Y-maze avoidance learning task in mice, deeply impaired retention of the temporal component of the task (leaving the start alley within the first 5 s of a trial), which significantly improved in controls during the hours following acquisition. In contrast the same substances had no or only slight effects on retention of the discrimination component (choice of the correct alley), which did not improve over time in control animals. This retention deficit did not appear to be due to an action on acquisition, retrieval and/or forgetting processes, or to state-dependent effects. Moreover, gamma-LGLA, CPP or AP5, when administered immediately after partial acquisition of a food-reinforced bar-press task, suppressed the spontaneous improvement in post-training performance observed in control mice 24 h after the training session. (R,S)-alpha-methyl-4-carboxyphenylglycine (MCPG), an antagonist of mGluRs, also suppressed the post-training performance increment and its effects were antagonized by the co-administration of trans-ACPD, an agonist of mGluRs. Post-training improvement of performance over time is thought to reflect an active and dynamic process, leading to the organization of memory traces. According to this hypothesis, our results suggest that synaptic plasticity mediated by NMDA receptors and/or mGluRs activation is involved in mechanisms underlying long-term consolidation of memory traces.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?